this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4902 readers
274 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] samc@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whilst this is very cool, I'm a little concerned about how the pros for "very light rail" basically amount to having better vibes than busses. Not that I even disagree with that premise, but I'd want something more concrete...

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It’s all about the cost savings (in the short term. I don’t know how long such trackwork would last)

[–] samc@feddit.uk 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's kind of my concern. I'm worried they're cutting so many corners that the competitive edge over busses all but vanishes and, best case scenario, this ends up being a bizarre PR campaign for public transit.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There are a lot of advantages of tram that you can't eliminate no matter how much cost you cut. It's quiet, it's smooth, it's electric and doesn't need big batteries, it's on separate tracks so it's predictable, it's ways easier to operate so thr drivers are easier to find.

[–] samc@feddit.uk 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think the article said CVLR would be battery powered to eliminate the need for overhead cables. I'm not saying I believe it is worse than e.g. and electric bus. But even the company producing it seems to struggle to articulate its advantages.

The reason I care is because I really want more trams in English towns/cities. But not if it's a pared down version that gives the entire concept a bad image

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Smaller batteries that can recharge a bit while the tram is at station is actually pretty cool concept that was tried several times and as far as I remember was deemed working.
But I get your point.