this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4902 readers
332 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] samc@feddit.uk 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Whilst this is very cool, I'm a little concerned about how the pros for "very light rail" basically amount to having better vibes than busses. Not that I even disagree with that premise, but I'd want something more concrete...

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It’s all about the cost savings (in the short term. I don’t know how long such trackwork would last)

[–] samc@feddit.uk 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's kind of my concern. I'm worried they're cutting so many corners that the competitive edge over busses all but vanishes and, best case scenario, this ends up being a bizarre PR campaign for public transit.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There are a lot of advantages of tram that you can't eliminate no matter how much cost you cut. It's quiet, it's smooth, it's electric and doesn't need big batteries, it's on separate tracks so it's predictable, it's ways easier to operate so thr drivers are easier to find.

[–] samc@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

I think the article said CVLR would be battery powered to eliminate the need for overhead cables. I'm not saying I believe it is worse than e.g. and electric bus. But even the company producing it seems to struggle to articulate its advantages.

The reason I care is because I really want more trams in English towns/cities. But not if it's a pared down version that gives the entire concept a bad image

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trams are common sense. So are trains.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

*Sensible

You overestimate "common"