this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
561 points (91.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

12020 readers
457 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The state of Michigan expects to spend $24,093 per lane-mile to maintain their roads. By contrast, the cheapest light rail line in the world costs $150 million per mile to build. Assuming that new rail line lasts for 6,000 years and never needs a single cent of maintenance, it might just barely break even with the financial cost of maintaining an existing road.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

But induced demand means the cost of more road is part of the road.

Plus im guessing that rail cost includes power delivery infra and actual engines/cars.

So add the cost of every gas station to that number. Add the cost of the cars and their maintenance, or some dubiously calculated fraction thereof.

Add the maintenance cost of driveways and garages. Of parking lots. Of parking structures.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Induced demand is a good point, but the cost of building new lane-miles of road is "only" about $5 million per mile. (In Florida; I can't find exact numbers for Michigan, but the variance is unlikely to be dramatic.)

Plus im guessing that rail cost includes power delivery infra and actual engines/cars.

Power delivery, maybe. Engines and cars, probably not (at least not meaningfully), since the numbers I'm seeing are for extensions to existing lines. But we don't need to worry about adding gas station costs or the costs of car ownership to that, because those are privately-owned (and thus privately-borne costs).

We're not talking about societal cost here. We're talking about why localities don't do this. And the answer is, because it's expensive: the upfront cost for a massive public works project that won't be finished until after the current office-holders are no longer in public service would be at or above a billion dollars.

Added bonus: private ownership of some portion of transportation costs means that the localities can offload a good chunk of the cost to the people in a way that makes them feel like they have "freedum!"

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

See im taking about reasons should(n't)

If we're talking about why they dont, then fed hwy subsidy should also factor, and roads are functionally free to local budgets.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I've definitely been coming at this from a perspective of why they don't. I absolutely think they should, even with all of the reasons that I've stated; though I acknowledge that it'd take a while and a lot of money to make the shift.

Yep, the federal highway subsidy is definitely a big factor here, too (though I don't think that's as big a deal as it might seem; numbers that are too big just become part of the marketing in the campaign to replace you. "outhouseperilous voted to spend $450 million on transportation last year!" becomes the soundbite, and your protestations that subsidies covered the entire cost won't get any traction).

To say nothing of how it's "woke" to not worship at the feet of the automotive industry.

not worshipping and going to the other r/fuckcars woukd be woke, god theyre sexy

Oh, thats true. Nevermind. I dont want to be burned as a heretic.