this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
648 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24106 readers
2888 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 117 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Trump is backed by billionaires whose new model for America is a bunch of distributed states, with different areas that are ruled by those billionaires who will become monarchs.

That's what the Behind the Bastards episode on Curtis Yarvin said.

[–] thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Isn’t this just… feudalism

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago

Yes, but add Techno to the front in the worst way possible.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's way cooler if you add techno to the beginning of all the things. Technofeudalism. Technogarchy (ok maybe not that one). Technofascism.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Technoligarchy was RIGHT THERE

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was so right there, that my brain autocorrected their comment to read as such.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago

Technoautocorrect

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Brandonazz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where is my cyberpunk french revolutionpunk rpg setting crossover??

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Brandonazz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Whoa! Thanks for the recommendation, looks sick.

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine feudalism but with modern surveillance, propaganda and technology.

America is in for a rough decade.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Only a decade?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

I watched CBS or some outfit like that try to interview Curtis and dig deeper on the guy.

And all I could think is - JFC, the right is terrible at finding someone with even a smidge of coherent thinking. Curtis Yarvin is exactly the type of dipshit I thought he might be given what I was hearing about the guy. I remember way back when, Sam Harris interviewed that other total dumbass masquerading as some kind of vanguard for rightwing intellectualism: Jordan Peterson. And watching Curtis was a lot like that - a total hot mess and just infuriating to watch/listen to.

All I could think about either of them is - just who the fuck is worshipping these assholes? They both come off like incoherent dumbfucks that apparently didn't learn or understand critical thinking, don't really seem to understand anything about philosophy (but sure claim to) and generally come off as someone maybe a freshman during a bong session might consider very deep, but just faceplant when confronted by anyone with even a modicum of understanding of these things - see Jordan Peterson's recent bellyflop when "debating" those atheists. Holy fuck is he an idiot.

Curtis somehow seems even stupider than Jordan Peterson.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Yes it's called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment

And most of the strings for it at this point are being pulled by Peter Thiel

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 days ago

It's the hunger games version of the USA

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Corporate feudalism.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Its just fucken Cyberpunk 2020 except theres no cool cyborg parts.

[–] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Things are on course for America to become the America depicted in 1/2 White or Black. The Chicago seen in there is a chaotic city state where the whole populace is trying to rob and kill each other off.

The US in there was only pulled out of a nuclear civil war by some extraterrestrial-loving religious dudes.

[–] Trimatrix@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Sounds like a prelude to the Hunger Games