this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
641 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24062 readers
3169 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Some of you lemmy users really are keyboard warriors. I understand your frustration with what’s going on but your call for violence just shows you don’t actually care about people’s lives. The people of California are just numbers to you.

Even though California is the symbol of liberalism, it is still one of the largest populations of conservatives in the country. Newsome has a duty to all residents of the state, not just liberals. All out civil war is not a decision to make so lightly.

If you feel so strongly feel free to get off Lemmy and go fight. I really feel the same people calling for him to do more are the same people who voted 3rd party. Just an utter lack of any critical thinking.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Repeal your anti 2a laws so your residents can defend themselves, California. The actions of POTUS are clear and present threats

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 39 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

It’s already authoritarianism.

Not a step towards it. We’re already there. I don’t get this reluctance to call a spade a spade until someone’s using it to shovel dirt on the commenter having already dug the grave with it in their presence.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago

this video puts it amazingly:

The south bank of the Rubicon - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YFdwfNh5vs

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

Capitalists always thinking "I better leave a back door open here in case this turns into an opportunity..."

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

We were there years ago. I'm Canadian. In our parliament we have opposition. Sure, it's not always effective and it can slow things down. However, having opposition in government means that the hasty, bad decisions need a moment to be considered by everyone. I know it doesn't always work, but it IS important. The American Democrats should be a gateway that filters out personal and political missteps. Looks like a little grease on those wheels keeps conservatives rolling right though any would-be regulation.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 12 hours ago

He should go a step further and publicly call for Trump's arrest, followed with a list of charges.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago

Politicians pointing out Trumps "Authoritarianism" are dumb and complicit... dont just criticize, do something. LEAD.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 117 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Trump is backed by billionaires whose new model for America is a bunch of distributed states, with different areas that are ruled by those billionaires who will become monarchs.

That's what the Behind the Bastards episode on Curtis Yarvin said.

[–] thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Isn’t this just… feudalism

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago

Yes, but add Techno to the front in the worst way possible.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's way cooler if you add techno to the beginning of all the things. Technofeudalism. Technogarchy (ok maybe not that one). Technofascism.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Technoligarchy was RIGHT THERE

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Brandonazz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where is my cyberpunk french revolutionpunk rpg setting crossover??

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine feudalism but with modern surveillance, propaganda and technology.

America is in for a rough decade.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

Corporate feudalism.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Yes it's called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment

And most of the strings for it at this point are being pulled by Peter Thiel

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I watched CBS or some outfit like that try to interview Curtis and dig deeper on the guy.

And all I could think is - JFC, the right is terrible at finding someone with even a smidge of coherent thinking. Curtis Yarvin is exactly the type of dipshit I thought he might be given what I was hearing about the guy. I remember way back when, Sam Harris interviewed that other total dumbass masquerading as some kind of vanguard for rightwing intellectualism: Jordan Peterson. And watching Curtis was a lot like that - a total hot mess and just infuriating to watch/listen to.

All I could think about either of them is - just who the fuck is worshipping these assholes? They both come off like incoherent dumbfucks that apparently didn't learn or understand critical thinking, don't really seem to understand anything about philosophy (but sure claim to) and generally come off as someone maybe a freshman during a bong session might consider very deep, but just faceplant when confronted by anyone with even a modicum of understanding of these things - see Jordan Peterson's recent bellyflop when "debating" those atheists. Holy fuck is he an idiot.

Curtis somehow seems even stupider than Jordan Peterson.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 day ago

It's the hunger games version of the USA

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its just fucken Cyberpunk 2020 except theres no cool cyborg parts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 56 points 1 day ago (5 children)

So what are we going to DO about it?

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Can someone explain to me these little self-flagellation parties (edit: meaning the replies below, not the root level comment I’m replying to) that seem to appear with every other dystopian headline in this community?

I mean like this mopey circlejerk right here, with Americans unironically declaring “no one is doing anything!” when literally every day brings more news from the hundreds of large active US protests which lately have been maturing as the fash behaves predictably. Even if that weren’t the case, isn’t the obvious solution to “be the change” or are we not doing basic grassroots work anymore?

This shit is really persistent on lemmy, like some kind of self-affirming narrative to excuse inaction, or maybe doomerist/accelerationist propaganda, or some other internet koolaid I’m too offline to understand.

But I want to know how to get the disillusioned circlejerkers plugged into local efforts. The boots on the ground reality of the work being done, not to mention all the preparation leading up to this phase, seems like it’s right in front of them yet they can’t/won’t see it. We really need all the help we can get.

And on a personal level, it’s getting hard to watch them on here whining that no one is doing anything, high-fiving each other for admitting they’re also not doing anything, and other one-downsman-ship type behaviors, because a bunch of people have been busting ass out here for a while and like, if you don’t want to or can’t help, fine. But then you don’t get to complain on the internet that we’re not doing enough.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You two are saying the same thing. The little people are putting in all the resistance work right now, and we’re calling on leadership to join us. They haven’t yet, so we will keep applying pressure. It’s not defeatist at all, you seem to be projecting your own emotions there.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 11 hours ago

Yes I wasn’t referring to the comment I replied to, but rather all the replies below it. I can see how that might be confusing so I’ll clarify the comment.

Regardless, you’ve probably seen better examples of what I’m talking about, and if you have any ideas, I’m all ears.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 16 hours ago

Looks like Los Angeles is doing it, maybe NY and DC could too.

[–] bluemite@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sit back and ask the question on the internet!

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago

The most honest answer out there.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

The same thing that has been done since the start of the regime.

Nothing!

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Issuing a strongly-worded statement, that'll show 'em

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the Chuck Schumer School of Resistance Fighting.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

"Fight" is a bit too violent a piece of rhetoric for Schumer

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

Step towards? No. We’re well past the line. This is authoritarianism, but without a major revolution of some kind, it is going to worse. Much, much worse.

[–] ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Newsom already sent a stern letter, and now he's posted a TWEET? This is getting serious now...

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In fairness, he's announced he will sue Trump and that presumably takes time.

[–] ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

Too bad dems already let him stack the courts, including SCOTUS.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The situation might be a little more urgent than who can win a 5 year long lawsuit. That’s like trying to deal with a house fire by filing insurance paperwork. Yeah, it needs to be done, but it’s hardly the only or most pressing thing to do.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

A judge may issue a stay potentially reversing Trump’s order sending in troops. Yes it may eventually be overturned, but those orders do succeed in delaying things when it comes to future military actions. The delay is still useful.

[–] match@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago

California AG filed suit earlier today

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

He did just announce that the state should withhold all federal taxes.

If he actually does it good, but also buckle up boys

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

He'll SLAM Trump next!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What would he even be arrested for? All this is something created entirely by donvict and his POS minions like Stephen Miller.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 22 hours ago

According to Trump? Because Newsom ran for governor. Literally what he said.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago

Criminal Democraticship.

Felony NotbeingRepublican.

Aggravated refusal to lick boots.

Something like that

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

There will be more governors that Trump calls for to be arrested.

load more comments
view more: next ›