Political Memes

8565 readers

2410 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.

Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Rooki@lemmy.world

automodbeta@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

WrenFeathers@lemmy.world

1323

How long will people be in denial that america is now a fascist regime? You all really going to wait until trumps third term until you come to terms with it, arent you? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

268 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Statistically, there are more than enough people who voted for Biden and then for Trump 2.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That sentence makes no sense.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Let's put it into math instead:

Let S~1~ be the set of people who voted for Biden. Let S~2~ be the set of people who voted for Trump's second term.

S~1~ ∩ S~2~ ≠ {}

If that's not helpful, let's try code:

s1 = getPeopleWhoVotedForBiden()
s2 = getPeopleWhoVotedForTrumpsSecondTerm()

if (x for x in s1 if x in s2 > 0):
  print("There are more than enough people qualifying for for what I said")

And lastly, to reformulate the sentence:

There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

hah, you looked up an intersection symbol, nice. And now I just cant help myself since you gave me that response..

So of 152 million votes cast, you'd like to show a sample size of just 1 person or more proves your hypothesis? seems pretty biased against the null hypothesis.

And your restatement of your hypothesis: "There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump."

You are proving "lots" with > 1? thats just not what "lots" means in english.

And I think we're done here.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You are right, I had trouble defining "lots" or "enough" in math or code :)

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

:-) all in good fun. I couldnt help myself, sorry.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

All good, neither could I :)