Excellent argument, I'm convinced and will go kill myself now.

Okay, that was a childish response. I'll give you a real one: What did your "protest" get us? Netanyahu and Trump are openly planning to depopulate and bulldoze Gaza to turn it into a playground for the rich. It's hard to say what Harris would be doing but I doubt it would be that!

Harris has been for the most part quiet about almost all of his policies so far. I can't claim to know her reasons but if I had to speculate it's probably an attempt to save face and not be seen as a sore loser. I'm not a Harris worshipper but I believe whole heartedly that she was the clear "less bad" option. I genuinely cannot comprehend disagreement with that given we're only 6 months into this administration and we've already seen massive international and domestic upheaval and hundreds of thousands of people negatively affected by deviation from typical conduct. For instance, do you think Harris and the Democrats would be pursuing Medicaid and SNAP cuts if they had won instead?

There’s little reason to think she wouldn’t have ordered the exact same type of strike Trump just did. She would spin it as “being the tough cop on the international scene.”

What's your basis for this statement? My basis for believing that she would not do this is the record of her recent Democratic presidential precedessors. Obama and Biden's Iran policies were largely characterized by attempts to deescalate tensions and move towards more normal relations. Of course, that is difficult when allyship with Israel is a cornerstone of US Middle East strategy, but they went about it in markedly different ways than Trump did in his first term and what he's doing now.