this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
299 points (99.0% liked)

Selfhosted

46672 readers
262 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Misleading as fuck. The Timeline feature never went away - it's just device-only.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Google also accidentally deleted a random amount of user's timeline data if you didn't immediately catch it and restore from back up last March before the affected backups were overwritten. If you didn't keep a close enough watch on your timeline to know that that happened, everything before ~Feb 2025 is gone now.

Ask me how I know. Yes I kept up on permissions. Yes I had backups on. No I didn't have a new device. I even have dozens of available gigabytes of paid storage on Google One.

I'm sure it will only get more stable due to maps and timeline being revenue generators that encourage investment.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

It requires drill down now and doesn't list visits on the location itself which is a huge negative.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's a good chunk of us who used it with the web, and they're adding that to the vast Google graveyard. That in and of itself makes me excited to see an alternative because Google will kill the app version on a whim too.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The device only was for privacy. When the data was stored in the cloud, the government had unrestricted access. By making it device only they need to get your device to get that data.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Privacy? I'm sure that Google tried so hard to monetize it and after so many years they didn't found a way, couldn't use it for ai training too, so they decided to turn it off and save millions in database costs.

They still exfiltrate user movements for improving Google maps, it's just that they don't need to keep them indefinitely or for years or maintain a nice interface for that

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

I'm sure Google does monetize the gps data instantly, then throws it away rather than save old data that only costs money to respond to government requests.

This is a case where privacy is economically beneficial to Google.

[–] 3abas@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, that's correct, Google didn't do it out of the goodness of their non-existent heart, they made what they think is the best financial decision.

It's a good one for the consumer though, whether see that or not. It's good that your every move ever taken is stored in a company's database.

Don't worry, they most certainly used it to train a decent model of any typical American demographics movements before scrubbing it.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Lol. The only thing this setting does is hide the information from the user. Google, or a thousand other data brokers (many probably created by Google for this purpose) still retain that data indefinitely.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It never went away. It's still a feature. It's just stored locally on your device. Thats it.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, technically it's still on the tiny screen of your phone with a really bad ux to make it go, sure. But you see how 'went away' is both true for web and effectively true for phone app? You do see that, right?

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, super hard to find...

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What does device-only mean in this context? That it's only stored on your phone?

[–] dan@upvote.au 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because of various privacy legislation, and people not wanting Google to track them as much, they stopped syncing the data to Google servers. As someone who's worked at big tech companies, my guess would be that storing so many people's location history was flagged as an issue during a privacy audit.

It's entirely local now. You can enable encrypted backups and back up the data, however you can really only have the data on one device now, and the web version is gone.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 11 points 1 day ago

It's no longer accessible from a desktop, only from the Google Maps app.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 day ago

What else could that possibly mean?

[–] Paige@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Thanks for clarifying, I was worried for a second.