this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

Opensource

3667 readers
299 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gigachad@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago (12 children)

With open source you never have a guarantee for long-term support. I guess it was forked because the original app was not maintained anymore?

Idk about 2.0, but I am using this app for a year now. It got 3 updates last month

[–] artyom@piefed.social -5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

Yeah that's the thing. I can't be dependent on such a thing that very well might stop functioning at any time. The fact that it's not first-party does not fill me with confidence.

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Well then you you need to pay for proprietary software or give your data to Google and friends.

There is no such thing aa "first party" in most open source projects. This repo has contributions by 111 different developers at the moment.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well then you you need to pay for proprietary software or give your data to Google and friends.

No. No I sure don't.

There is no such thing aa "first party"

There is. It's the original development team of the project.

This repo has contributions by 111 different developers at the moment.

All to the same first-party SyncThing repo.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is. It's the original development team of the project.

The one that got discontinued, you mean? It didn't matter that it was "first party" as it still got the axe. This fork has existed for multiple years now, and may end up having a longer life than the "first party" one had.

This is not uncommon in the open source space.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it still got the axe

Yes I do remember saying that a few hours ago.

may end up having a longer life than the "first party" one had.

You can "may" anything you want.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good job avoiding my point entirely :)

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I didn't avoid your point at all.

I wasn't discussing what "may" happen. I was discussing what's more likely to happen.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's still something that may happen. Just because you think that third party is more likely to go away doesn't mean it will happen. So yes, you completely avoided my point and continue to do so. You even used "might" earlier. That sounds a lot like may to me.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)