this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
159 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

32554 readers
340 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JuniperusVox@beehaw.org 45 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Why are y'all so damn negative? Every thread I've seen on here about Starfield has been like this. It's not even out yet, god damn

[–] SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 years ago

Have you seen the state of AAA gaming right now? And Bethesda's past record? I would be surprised if it didn't turn out to be shit.

[–] CIWS-30@kbin.social 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Given how modern AAA games are and Bethesda's recent track history, it's not negative to be skeptical, it's smart.

Especially since despite Microsoft watching over them and helping them to have the most "bug free launch in history" it's still probably going to be a hot mess for weeks to a month after launch. I want to be pleasantly surprised, but I'm not getting my hopes up.

Plus, the recent release of Baldur's Gate 3 with no microtransactions or season passes, etc. has gotten peoples' standards up, and given that Microsoft paid a lot of money to buy Bethesda, we're aware that they're going to have to make that money back somehow, and will probably give into the temptation to do some really player unfriendly things to do it.

Bethesda's been going all in on surprisingly expensive microtransactions for really tiny amounts of content, like in Fallout 4 and 76, and it wouldn't be shocking for them to continue in that direction. People aren't being mindlessly negative, they're looking at current and past trends and making an educated guess about the future.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Bethesda's been going all in on surprisingly expensive microtransactions for really tiny amounts of content, like in Fallout 4 and 76, and it wouldn't be shocking for them to continue in that direction.

This isn't even new. Bethesda literally set the standard for overpriced MTX with the god damn horse armor in Oblivion for $7.50. That was the first time in history the microtransaction was used and it garnered much the same response as they do now.

[–] Sordid@beehaw.org 23 points 2 years ago

Experience. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me, uh, you can't get fooled again!

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Because - and this is the only real answer you'll get - Starfield is "cool" and "normies" are looking forward to it. Therefore, the "real gamers" must hate it, ESPECIALLY before actually playing it.

Same shit you see in any niche community. Buncha nerds hating on anything too big or popular.

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or just look at Bethesda's track record the last two decades...

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In the past two decades they delivered some of the most successful, beloved games of all time.

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think this comment deserves the effort it would take me to properly respond to that.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No, you can measure it in things like sales and review scores. Sure, they also put out games like Fallout 76 and Wolfenstein: Young Blood, but two decades is enough to capture Skyrim and Fallout 3.

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I really didn't like Skyrim, Fallout 3, Oblivion, Fallout 4, or 76. Still playing Morrowind and New Vegas though. I could go on about why for a looooooooong time but really don't care to. Suffice to say there are plenty of people (obviously) that are not happy with those games. I bought them all too so that would show up in sales data. Shame on me, I guess. I've been burned enough times that I'm not even going to bother being excited about this one.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But there are also tons of people who've been plenty pleased with those games, as you can see on the long tails of their sales and how many concurrent players they retain to this day. You're the odd one out on those heavy hitters. Not so much on 76, and to a lesser extent, 4.

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The context of this discussion is that the top post claimed that people only are shitting on starfield because "normies" like it so none of that is relevant. All I'm saying is that there are legitimate reasons to have low expectations. The people who like those games aren't the same people complaining about Bethesda/Starfield, they are people like me who have been disillusioned with bethesda for years after a long series of disappointing releases. It is especially frustrating because we KNOW they can do better, because they have in the past. They just don't. The amount of people who will end up loving Starfield has no bearing on my ability to enjoy the game.

With that said, I'd be plenty happy for this to end up being another Morrowind or New Vegas. Now I feel I've proved my point so I'm gonna go play some Morrowind. 😜

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I just think you would have made your point better if you had said maybe one decade, because two decades catches some certified bangers in the public consciousness.

[–] Sordid@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

two decades is enough to capture Skyrim and Fallout 3.

So a decent but by no means amazing game and a complete turd? Not really helping your case here very much, IMO. The last truly great game Bethesda made was Morrowind, and I will die on this hill.

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Successful and good are completely different and unrelated metrics. Fifty Shades of Grey was extremely successful, but no one in their right mind would ever call it good. Psychonauts was met with universal acclaim, and is widely considered to be one of the best games of all time, and yet it was a complete flop and needed more than a decade to get a sequel.

Bethesda games are extremely successful. They are not good games, and their success is not a good thing. Bethesda kicked off microtransactions in 2007 with Horse Armour. This decision completely fucked the wider industry. Not a fan.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

So...that's your personal taste. Fifty Shades of Grey wouldn't have been successful if no one liked it, and we can quantify some form of quality via review scores. Some of Bethesda's games have reviewed phenomenally well, especially in as large of a bucket as the past 20 years of their history. If I was the sole dictator of what was good, no one would be playing the latest Assassin's Creed game or Hades, but plenty of people love those games; the majority would say they're great, and we can measure that to some degree.

[–] SugarApplePie@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm sure that drives a good chunk of it, but it's more likely that there are a lot of people that have had their fill of Bethesda games that all basically play the same, just in different settings, and those people tend to be in nerdier spots like this. Feels a little dorky to just blame it all on fun-hating nerds haha, what a coincidence that all the people that disagree with you are just mad losers!

Edit: Going back to this comment after Starfield came out and yeah, it's about what I expected. Skyrim in space lol. Can totally understand why people are underwhelmed or annoyed.

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Honestly mate? Not at all. I'm concerned about Starfield because of Bethesda's track record since Fallout 4, and in particular, their constant attempts to introduce paid 'mods' to their games through the creation club (which are always overpriced for tiny amounts of content) as well as how broken their games have been at launch since Morrowind. When my PC, which can run Baldur's Gate 3 on max settings, can't run Oblivion without mods without regular crashes, then there's a big problem.

I want Starfield to be good. But Bethesda do not make good games. They make broad games, but there's no depth, and what is there is fairly consistently buggy. They have the Pokemon problem though, where people are willing to give them a pass because of the big name. I guarantee you, if a smaller developer released games in the state that Bethesda does, their games would be (rightfully) panned.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

I'm not hyped for the game but I'm still curious to play it down the road once the inevitable and glaring bugs from the launch are patched.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It hasn’t come out yet so there is nothing positive to say

[–] JuniperusVox@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So how does that lead to so then there's only negative things to say? It is, once again, not out yet. I'm starting to dislike being in any community around games, because everyone appears to just hate games. It's exhausting.

[–] fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because we have memories long enough to remember literally every game Bethesda has released this millennium

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And yet you keep buying them?

Goddamn, stop doing that and get out of our fandom!

[–] fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

#Gatekeeping

I own every game they've ever released, but the expectation they've built over the last 20 years is that their games spend a year being trash, at least

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

Because fandom is basically a bunch of entitled brats with nothing better to do.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Very good point. Everything that we get now is marketing.

[–] Boleano@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

In addition to what others have said I also suspect that being a console exclusive has made some people be very critical of it. I'm not a big bethesda fan but what I have seen so far looks great and I'm looking forward to play it.