Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
view the rest of the comments
We live in a very car-centric culture, everything is a reminder.
Brand is a useless detail.
For nerds a detailed model wound be needed.
And for those saying 'that means rich' - ~~again more model info of the car~~ the info if there person is rich is needed.
A detail from the OPs article like:
There is a full vid too (some news vid):
The video you linked had a clip of the assailant with what looks like a mansion and several luxuries from a previous video. It definitely seems like this is a rich person.
Sorry, there seems to be some confusion & I prob wasn't clear - I never said he wasn't rich, the whole first part is a comment on the stupid article headline, the subject I was replying to (if anything, that it wasn't clear from the headline that he was rich).
They had his ID, they could have just said 'rich guy' instead of driver.
What about the video makes you think he is not rich?
Sorry, there seems to be some confusion & I prob wasn't clear - I never said he wasn't rich, the whole first part is a comment on the stupid article headline, the subject I was replying to (if anything, that it wasn't clear from the headline that he was rich).
They had his ID, they could have just said 'rich guy' instead of driver.
This makes more sense, now I understand what you mean. I think they use "mercedes driver", because it paints a picture. "Mercedes driver" implies not only "rich", but also "entitled", "anger management issues" and "difficulty with following road laws".
And at the same time it allows the reader (who might share some of these characteristics) to still claim moral superiority over that guy ("At least I don't drive a Mercedes").
It is, in fact, a very clever headline that does quite a lot with very little.
It does so using stereotypes and prejudices, and that might totally be seen as despicable. But I wouldn't call it stupid.
(In fact, labelling him as a "rich driver" does quite a similar thing. His wealth itself doesn't really matter for the story, unless you want to evoke the connotations of "entitled", "thinks he is above the law" and "gets away with doing things poor people could not get away with", while allowing people who share some of these characteristics to still claim moral superiority ("I'm not a rich asshole like that guy").)