this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
161 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
10827 readers
516 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Woukd nice if they could separate rear end with motors and electronics just before impact and recover and reuse
I think that would significantly impact the cost. To be far enough away to survive the explosion would require some sort of guidance system on the payload and the "parent" drone would need to be beefed up for the extra weight (from the added electronics and the battery to power the return flight.
I know they experimented with carrying a bunch of the DIY quads on large octocopters but I think they pivoted away from that
A fixed wing carrier makes a lot more sense. They can loiter/glide at higher altitudes for days.
Yeah, but even then I think it'd be hard to justify. You'd only need a fixed wing for distant targets and it's probably cheaper to just increase the battery capacity on the stingers themselves
I think either way there'd be signal and latency issues at that range. Not a problem for fixed wings because they fly more predictably but quads are required more active piloting so signal loss can really screw you