this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
-9 points (36.4% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1553 readers
16 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Argument about why an instance doesn't want to federate with another instance that's devoted to political trolling. Apparently that kind of behavior is simply a core tenet of the belief system, and to criticize it is to reject the whole ideology.

Modlog: https://lemmy.ml/modlog?userId=22989130

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't work, if you source anything they don't agree with they'll do mental gymnastics to find a way to discredit it in their mind and for their audience.

It's part of what you mentioned but it's deeper. Even evidence is viewed through the lens of my side or their side. They will only every engage with the evidence that agrees with them. People who push this point get ad hominemed, then the communist commentator (there has to be a shorter word for that) will play victim when this person inevitably does it back.

It's the same playbook every time, and it's clearly a community thing.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That's the path to victory though. As soon as you draw out the ad hominem, you've forced them to pivot off of the main topic, withdrawing from an untenable position.

You can't actually expect a zealot to admit they're wrong (edit: on an issue of core belief), that's not realistic. You need to be comfortable accepting something else as the conclusion of the argument, by necessity.