this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
1150 points (98.5% liked)

politics

26166 readers
2562 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it's "her decision to make," she is a "very, very good politician."

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been "out on the streets with her" and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. "It's so incredibly genuine and open."

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (41 children)

I really hate to say this, but there’s no way a woman will win in 2028 (if an election even happens).

The vast centrist vote will go towards stability and a return to the ‘values’ they think have been lost.

It sucks a lot, but the only viable choice will be a white man. I hate this, but it’s true.

Walz is probably the most politically viable choice. Does that suck? Yeah. But pragmatically, it’s just true.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I really hate to say this

Come on, do you really think that though? gender is an issue to be factored in, but considering it the primary factor is a level of cynicism thats effectively bordering on hopelessness. Maybe you earned that cynicism, I get that, being a a real american lefty is hard lately. How about we stand behind someone who inspires? Who seems to care about the issues that affect the constituents? who at least seems to not be one of the bought and paid for AIPAC drones?
But you'd ponder running some asshat zionist like walz or shaprio instead, simply because they have a pecker and no tits? I dont think america is so far gone that they would pass up an inspirational human for a male human. And if we are, then its not worth fighting for anyway. If we are that far gone then its time for all of us to run.

Reminds me of a quote from the green mile movie.
“I’m rightly tired of the pain I hear and feel, boss. I’m tired of bein on the road, lonely as a robin in the rain. Not never havin no buddy to go on with or tell me where we’s comin from or goin to or why. I’m tired of people bein ugly to each other. It feels like pieces of glass in my head. I’m tired of all the times I’ve wanted to help and couldn’t. I’m tired of bein in the dark. Mostly it’s the pain. There’s too much. If I could end it, I would. But I can’t.”

Gotta keep fighting till its time to run, and then keep fighting after that, or we'll be a disappointment to our kids.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

well. shit. If we cant unite behind a good candidate because we think an asshat consolation candidate must win, I dont know how we win, because the asshat candidates always sell us out in the end. It the DNC way of things.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s the human way of things.

DNC or not, even if they were as perfect as you’d like them to be, trying to unite people on the left is like herding cats.

Have you tried having discussions with multiple people on the left? I’ll bet you have, and I’ll bet you’ve been frustrated.

The problem with any of left of centre is that we believe in things and aren’t a flock of sheep. That’s good, but also politically very bad for us.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

even if they were as perfect as you’d like them to be

debateable. We cant grease the wheels of our government with massive amounts of innocent's human blood. If we do that then we dont deserve to exist ourselves.

Unfortunately. zionists support war crimes, and you can depend on them causing more war crimes if they get power. I cant have that. I'd rather the whole system burn down around us, and lots of people think that way. I think people conflating red lines with "not being perfect" is leaning into excusing ourselves of our responsibilities to each other.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Walz is an "asshat consolation candidate"? 🥹

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh. Hunh. Welp... 🤦🏼‍♂️

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah. otherwise I do like him a lot.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

NGL, kinda feels like having a strong preference on a waiter at dinner while the ship sinks around us. 🫩🤷🏽‍♂️

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

agreed, for both the case of whether you are for or against all of us lining up behind walz.

load more comments (39 replies)