this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
659 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

36867 readers
130 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This has been shining in my eyes for the last 10 minutes whilst the bus driver takes a break.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 102 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Technical education opens doors, or your child.

Please don’t open my child.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Put the knife away Waltuh

[–] frosty@pawb.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

I saw this, too, and I don't even have a child.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 75 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thankyou so much :) <3

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m surprised that’s legal. You’d think it would distract other drivers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In my area once in awhile I'll see this box truck where it's covered in LED screens with animated ads on it that drives around. Annoying at best, a road hazard at worst.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Same here, and great that it’s wasting gas and polluting at the same time! I hate it with a burning passion.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They drive these up and down the Las Vegas strip, which generally is snarled with traffic. So adding to traffic too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

to whomever invented ~~LED~~ advertisements.

fuck being bombarded with literal propaganda all day.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think such things are banned in Australia. Clearly not safe for traffic.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which is strange since we have full size electronic billboards (in WA). I don't believe they can have scrolling text/animations etcs, but they will change once or twice in the time you can see them at fwy speeds.
They are super repulsive to me because they are more vibrant and attention demanding than traditional printed billboards (especially in low light conditions) and feel like late 90's pop-up ads.

Also i dont need a ~25m² screen changing in my peripheral vision when im already busy keeping to keep an eye on some dickhead in a lifted ford raptor or Yank Tank who is cutting through traffic.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah it's ok on a static object by law, but not on a moving vehicle.

And yes, even here in Armidale we have about four of them, and they don't seem to have night dimming so can be a bit blinding.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They do need to be that bright at daytime, and most indeed use automatic brightness by default. If only there was a technology that could use daylight instead of fighting it...

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean, I don't think an advert needs to be illuminated at all, frankly

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They also don't need to be visible, or exist at all for that matter. I despise ads.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Try going even one day without seeing a fucking ad..

First off, the only real way to accomplish that, aside from being in a coma, is to spend the day out in the woods somewhere.

Then, when you get tangled up in a thorny vine and pull out your knife, BAM, advertising logo!

Then when you want to start a fire, you bust out your lighter, and BAM, advertising logo!

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, I don't mind brands visible on purchased goods per se, it's the same as a maker's mark like artisans have added to their wares for thousands of years. It's no more an ad than a book including the name of its author on the front.

But it's my conscious choice to buy certain products from certain brands, with careful considerations to quality and price. If a product is good and it is reasonably priced, I don't care if they have a logo on there. But I don't go buying products for the brand.

Where ads are different is that they intrude into parts of our lives they have no right to be in.

I want to watch some sports, but no, ads everywhere.

I want to watch a movie, but I have to sit through all the ads first.

I am waiting at the bus/train stop and there's business posters everywhere, and then the bus/train pulls up and it's covered in ads inside and out, all during my commute.

I'm in the waiting room at the doctor's office having a panic attack about the results of some recent tests and there's a dumb ad on the wall with some smiling white lady staring directly at me, who has everything figured out and can now live life to the fullest thanks to her doctor having prescribed [DrugName]™.

That's the shit I can't stand. When it's not possible to simply exist in life without some entity trying to extract capital from you at every turn.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

Ffs of all the colors they could have used too.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

We for real need to start legislating and enforcing brightness laws. These headlights are out of control. This thing is an abomination.

There is no rhyme or reason for anything beyond a reasonable street lamp and headlight. We kept asking could we, it's time to ask should we? If nothing else I miss seeing stars at night

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The issue with a lot of LED lights isn't brightness, its beam dip. The light should be angled downwards so it never shines into the oncoming traffic.

Unfortunately, a lot of retrofitted brighter bulbs don't play nicely with the beam dips. Car companies also err towards helping their diver, rather than the oncoming ones.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] subiacOSB@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago

Shit that’s bright af.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I saw one of those big rig trucks where the trailer was completely covered in LED advertising displays, on the left, right and back.

One of the ads was regarding broken phones, saying something along the lines of 'broken glass is a good thing'. Don't quote me on the exact wording though, I only saw that ad once, but it was regarding trade-ins and upgrades.

Kinda ironic to have such an ad displayed on a truck where you're tempted to bust their display with a sledgehammer...

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It looks like a UK bus. If you want to help make the bus company's life miserable there is a useful trick. This is the sort of thing a lot of parish council members will get disproportionately angry about. They also tend to have far less to do than higher bits of government. They also know a lot more about the inner workings of local government, and who's ear to burn about it. A politely written letter (or a few from several people) can get them up in arms about it.

Once you set that in motion, wait a week or 2, then also contact the local papers about it. I've seen them roll with far smaller stories than this.

Neither group has much/any hard power, but the soft power of the NIMBY croud can be extremely effective against public facing companies.

Edit to add.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/artificial-light-nuisances-how-councils-deal-with-complaints

It could be argued that that light is a statutory nuisance.

I read

"Technical Education Opens Doors

OR

Your Child"

I though it was a threat to either go to college, or satan takes your child as a sacrifice for being ignorant.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure I've seen them with the side panel showing the route the bus was travelling on.

No surprise that they eventually gave that up for ad money.

Next step will be to have that screen in colour and animated. And speakers.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wake up babe, new Ad Block just dropped.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Same goes for LED headlights. "Enjoy looking directly into lasers at night."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

road advertisement in general should be illegal, it's literally MADE to distract drivers

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Truly mildly infuriating. Nicely done.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm fortunate that the bins on my street are collected twice-daily. The trade-off is that the bins lorries have LED sides. Lights up my entire bedroom when they pull up. I'm also opposite a pub, so every Wednesday morning starting around 7 it's non-stop clanging from barrel deliveries. I live above two shopfronts, so every morning through midnight is bullshit noises. I live under a lamppost, so the council putting up Christmas lights means a cherry picker staring through my windows. I'm just bitching, but the LED buses and lorries are fuckin wild.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

FYI, your post title should use "whoever", not "whomever".

A good trick to tell whether to use "who" or "whom" is to replace "whom" with "him" or "who" with "he". It'll be immediately obvious (to a native English speaker) which is correct.

Whomever invented LED bus advertisements becomes Him invented LED bus advertisements

Vs

Whoever invented some stupid shit becomes He invented some stupid shit

[–] LeftRedditOnJul1@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

here just the city lights, and city street high beamers, and tall trucks that have only high beams and higher beams... anyway those are blinding enough as it is

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Having been to Manchester very recently, I can think of bigger things to complain about.

(Not that I have room to talk, being in Blackburn.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whoever*

Whom is an object, who is a subject. An object usually follows prepositions like “to”, so it’s good instinct to use whomever here, but in this case the object is the entire clause “whoever invented …”, so the whoever is the subject of the verb invented.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

At the very least, can they not be blue? It's the worst color at night.

Red would be best--it fucks with your eyes the least--but there's often legal limits on red lights (besides brake/turn signals) on non-emergency vehicles. Something in orange or yellow would be less harsh.

load more comments
view more: next ›