this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
96 points (96.2% liked)

science

16070 readers
623 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teft@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago

“Ea-nasir, you dog. Once again I’m writing to complain about your gods forsaken copper…”

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope is related to someone shitting on a vendor.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh, shit, it's a volcano! Ruuuuu

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

"Be sure to drink your Ovaltine"

[–] PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

a crummy ad?

[–] Bischmeister@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The scroll of Truth!

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I hope it sais that god is angry at people for killing each other over him and yelling at them furiously to kill each other over land and resources!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure you want to take the advice on how to not anger the gods from a scroll from Herculaneum.

Unless you do the opposite.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Seems like it's from the same dude's library as the one from last year, and he was into Epicurean philosophy, though not the hedonistic caricature that's come down to us.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cool, but using AI means that we won't be able to completely trust the results

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not the AI you're thinking of. This has nothing to do with image creation or large language models.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Good (but sad) demo of how LLMs and stable diffusion have completely poisoned the term AI to the point that even legit use-cases get shit on by association.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Or how it has normalized using AI for everything between heaven and earth, when what is actually going on is machine learning. AI implies that the machine is thinking for itself, which of course leads (reasonable) people to draw conclusions that it's not a very reliable source.

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nothing in existence that has been labeled AI is AI. If AI (actual meaning of the words) exists, it's in some secret facility and we don't know about it. AI outside of fiction is a meaningless marketing term. That was already the case before LLMs and stable diffusion.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

There aren't literal bugs inside of computers like in the original use of that word, but I'm guessing you have no objections in that case and you might think about that.

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's go ahead and call Trump's politics "liberal justice". It's all just meaningless words that we can associate with whatever we want. That's more along the lines of how "AI" is used in marketing.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or maybe we can accept that language is fluid and what you want something to mean and what everyone else thinks it means are in no way the same and never will be.

That said, Trump is 100% a classical liberal so I'm highly amused that was the example you decided to go with.

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yah, right, and Hitler was a communist. /s

I've no time/energy to deal with that level of trolling right now.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Amazing. You are so invested in being correct that you didn't even bother looking to see what I'm talking about and just declared it to be trolling.

Which also does not fit the original definition of trolling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(slang)

Apparently there is only one instance where the original definition is the only one that matters to you.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you’re thinking of AGI.

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No. That's another bullshit marketing term people came up with when confronted with the fact that their "AI" contains no I.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No, it’s a term that creates a meaningful distinction between what you seem to think AI means and what it actually means.

If you refuse to accept either term then I can only assume you’re just being stubborn for the sake of it.

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

A distinction necessitated by marketing abusing it and watering it down beyond usefulness. Rinse and repeat and we'll be talking about SAAGAITSRI (super advanced actual general artificial intelligence that shows real intelligence) in 10 to 20 years.