this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
585 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

12947 readers
1651 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smashley91@lemm.ee 56 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 10 points 8 hours ago

Well i certainly know i do now.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago
[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Would love to have a wood pecker as a pet, but the last thing I need in my financial situation is another bill.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

This is why I got chickens instead of ducks.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 23 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

CMV: Trypophobia should be tagged as NSFW.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

We have AI which is good at image recognition. Just use this little schmuck to add tags to posts and allow users to filter tags. Would also helo with Trump/Elon filtering etc.

[–] FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works 31 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Genuine questions for the purpose of discussion: should photos of spiders also be marked as NSFW for arachnophobia? What other phobias should and shouldn't be considered in this?

I do not have any genuine phobias, so I concede that I'm speaking out of my limited knowledge coming only from years of solo and group therapy for other issues, but NSFW tags are intended to block images that you wouldn't want your boss (or mom, or general public) to see you looking at due to them being sexual or otherwise inappropriate. There are a lot of things that are going to trigger phobias and other very difficult feelings for a lot of people, but I don't think it's feasible to ask that everyone accommodate all possibilities when posting images or sharing stories. I think it's a positive thing to tag content warnings in bodies of text, for example, and at the same time I think that a person that can have an extreme reaction to what is otherwise an innocuous image due to a personal issue needs to take responsibility for it.

I hope this doesn't come across as minimizing the very real struggles that people with phobias have to deal with on a daily basis, and as a whole I support making public spaces more accessible.

ETA: my understanding of a phobia is having an irrational fear so severe that it causes very real and disruptive anxiety and panic upon being exposed to the phobia. If seeing an image like this causes you discomfort or unease, but doesn't really affect you severely or impact your life negatively, is that really a phobia?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I think trypophobia is a "meme" phobia on the internet.

Like how everyone says "oh that's my OCD". It's not really OCD (and it's somewhat demeaning to people that do really have OCD), they're just picky/finicky/particular.

Same with trypophobia. It may be a crippling phobia to a small amount of people, but it's unsettling at most to a lot of people. Like that. Lots of people don't have a serious phobia around a bunch of holes (some people do, I'm not saying it's not real)...it just makes them feel really uncomfortable in a weird and almost indescribable way.

[–] Phlimy@jlai.lu 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I definitely think content warnings (not specifically "NSFW") are ideal for this. Sure, the line between what should and shouldn't be content-warned is blurry, and you don't need to go through every highly-specific issue someone might have with your post, but things like tripophobia (or arachnophobia) are pretty widely known so it makes sense to warn about it imo. Especially for image posts since you can't really just "not look at it" if it pops up in your feed.

And whether or not the warning is precisely about a "phobia" isn't relevant imo. It's just a nice thing to do, as it avoids causing others to feel suddenly itchy and uncomfortable for several minutes.

So no, I wouldn't tag spider images as NSFW, but I'd definitely add a "CW: spider" if Lemmy supported it 🙂

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Part of the problem is the lack of tools/functionality. Lemmy doesn't allow for hiding images without the NSFW tag. It could/should function a lot more like mastodon in some ways in our opinion, allowing both the user to hide all images in their settings and having more specific CWs that could hide even the post image behind.

[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 3 points 10 hours ago

There is Lemmy RFC that addresses more CW tags

I think that sometimes CW are used incorrectly and it produces absurd situations like CW on a poem: Content warning mastodon field with doll, gun and food

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 day ago

i guess woodpeckers don't get trypophobia

[–] Wabbitsmiles@lemmy.world 140 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] abcd@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Like most phobias I think most people experience discomfort with this imagery but to really have a phobia it needs to be an unreasonable level of anxiety I think.

IDK why we have a hard wired aversion to these. It might be a vestigial response to some kind of predator or danger which is no longer relevant.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think that it disgusts me and makes me extremely uncomfortable. I would avoid it at all costs and I would probably freak out if I wound up unknowingly close to it. It is a weird type of fear. I can't explain why but my body will insist I stay far the hell away.

[–] ThoGot@lemm.ee 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

These kinds of pictures remind me of some type of weird infection

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Gives me feeling of burning the sickness out!

[–] ChaoticCookie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago

Woah what a coincidence! Same here!

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Oh, you talking about bot flies?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I didn't even understand what I was seeing and I started shivering instantly. Now feel a deep urge to scrub my skin with steel wool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

This hole is mine!

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 89 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Shouldn't this be: A Woodpecker Preparing for Winter? The order of words a in sentence, difference makes.

[–] SnowChickenFlake@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, sounds like a title to a recipe 😆

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I stuff my woodpecker's holes full of acorns before I gobble it up. Doesn't everyone?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 points 23 hours ago

Perhaps it's translated from another language. The whole thing seems a little stilted, so maybe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Acorn: this hole is meant for me!

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Deutsche Democratischen Republik?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Dritte Deutsche Revolution?

Deutschland Dance Revolution?

Dance, Deutsche Republik?

Can't decide which one is funnier 🤔

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is amazing. I have a question though: How come only the author woodpecker can remove the acorns but not other woodpeckers? What kind of ID tech are these guys using?

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

They jam the acorn in hard enough that you have to break the acorn to get it out. If they put it in too small a hole, though, it breaks and rots. Too big a hole and they get taken.

EDIT: clearly didn't read closely enough. PBS says that woodpecker families run security on their stashes. So they basically just attack anybody who tries stealing. So I guess the ID tech is 'eyes'.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 16 points 18 hours ago

'patrols and batons' classic

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Not only did you just repeat the information already given in the original post, but you didn’t even address the guys question you’re responding to.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

ChatGPT is more human-like than I thought.

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 19 hours ago

Woops, you right. Didn't read carefully enough. I'll add the answer in an edit.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since they don't have fingerprints they ID the pecker.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[–] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago
[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is making me feel queasy cos that tree makes me think of skin and the things in it zits.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's trypophobia . Don't Google it though, might come up with a lot of triggering pictures.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Why so many people are complaining and having trypophobia in this thread? Is that very common? I've never heard of it before

load more comments
view more: next ›