this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
184 points (93.0% liked)

World News

45286 readers
3532 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 55 points 4 days ago

All this pedantism about century start dates, and everyone missed they could have called her a millennium baby but went for century instead.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Plot twist: The year 2000 Chinese New Year was actually on February 5th, a year of the dragon.

https://www.pinyin.info/chinese_new_year/cny2000-2099.html

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Plot twist: Centuries end in "0", they don't start in "0".

The 21st Century started 1/1/2001.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 21 points 4 days ago

Mathematics and languages have different rules.

In languages it is possible for one century to be a yewa shorter than all the others. Other centuries begin on a year divisible by hundred, but centuries 1–99 and -1–-99 don't. They are both missing a year, and outside mathematics that's just fine.

If almost all native speakers of a language say that a century begins in a year divisible by hundred then that's how it goes in that language.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fuck sake, I thought we'd left this argument back in 99.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 8 points 3 days ago

We’re still gonna party.

[–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Correct.

The 1st century started at 1 A.D. and included 100. 2nd century started 101 to 200. Etc etc. If you change the 21st century to be 2000. You would to shift everything down. Eventually making the 1st century 99 years. Or creating a year 0 or using 1BC.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This is why the years in the "20th Century" started with "19". 20 is the end, not the start.

[–] faultywalnut@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was the 20th century because if you count centuries starting at 1-99 CE, 1900-1999 is the twentieth one

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

One to 99 is not a century. :)

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I don't feel like this is correct.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Haha, touché salesman 👍

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So actually a quarter-century baby.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Wtf a deadly heart attack at age 25??

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Delay nothing

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Not sure he is missing out on much... Another 50 years of working to stay alive...

Maybe he moved on to a better place.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

That’s not a good sign

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

One year too early for the title? The 21st century started on 2001.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's complicated.

There's a "strict" way and then there's a "common perception and practice" way. You're thinking of the strict way.

But yeah, sure. I guess it's due to the fact that we don't have a year zero, really, which is counterintuitive for us in the modern era, I suppose. At least for me.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How so? The first century surely started with year 0, the first year. Just like a person is zero years old during its first year. And years 0-99 make up the first century. Then the second century starts at 100-199, and so on. 🤷‍♂️

[–] falseprophet@fedia.io 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

there is no year 0 we started at 1.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] falseprophet@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In many Asian countries they do if I am not mistaken but it irrelevant to when the millennium starts anyway

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

In many Asian countries they do if I am not mistaken

Huh, that's really interesting ☺️ kinda cute ngl

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

You should have told that to those guys 2025 years ago.

There is no year 1 in our current calendar system either. The Gregorian Calendar begins in 1582. The Julian Calendar includes year 1, but changed in year 8, so 0001-01-01 is a slightly different day in the Gregorian Calendar, the Julian Calendar, and the old Julian Calendar. 2000 years after Julian Calendar 0001-01-01 is late December 2000.

This has less meaning in China because China used its own calendar until 1911. People living in China 2000 years before 2001-01-01 would not have called it year 1.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] falseprophet@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Looked it up now, you're correct.

Although there are instances of year zero, like with astronomical years.