this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
475 points (97.4% liked)

politics

23061 readers
3277 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The MAGA cinematic universe has gone into full meltdown after the Supreme Court temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s latest deportation push.

The ruling halted deportations that rely on the Alien Enemies Act—in a stunning 7-2 decision. “The Supreme Court would rather actively participate in America’s ruination,” wrote DHS liaison Paul Ingrassia.

“We live in a society where foreign alien terrorists have unlimited free legal representation,” Stephen Miller posted.

Tom Fitton suggested Trump suspend habeas corpus to “reverse the Biden invasion.” “Who will compensate the American people for the lasting damage?” Rep. Mary Miller asked.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] witnessbolt@lemm.ee 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Some of these guys are very, very dangerous and will push us towards civil war before they give up power.

Remember that violence is what they want so they have an excuse to crack down and use martial law, etc.

The Courts must uphold the rule of law despite these threats. This is (supposed to be) America. We are not free unless everyone has due process.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

MAGA will just say, “tHoUghTs AnD PrAyErS”. But if a Dem said that, MAGA will just say, “domestic terrorism!”

[–] witnessbolt@lemm.ee 7 points 5 hours ago

They will gaslight this country to its death.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago

Being able to remember is so surreal these days. I remember when Republicans attacked my country and tried to kill elected leaders. I remember when the domestic terrorists were taken in like sons and daughters. I remember CPAC declaring "We are all domestic terrorists."

And now they're saying terrorists don't deserve due process.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

It was funny watching all the conservative cucks dogpile on the comments section of the MSNBC youtube video that broke the story over the weekend, and every one of them was putting their ignorance of the constitution on full display - more proof that they don't actually understand anything about how government works and should not be taken seriously or given any kind of real power or authority.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

“We live in a society where foreign alien terrorists have unlimited free legal representation,” Stephen Miller posted.

Which society is this, and how can I travel to it?

[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Stephen Miller's quote is of course quite hyperbolic but in fact yes, the US constitution says even foreign alien terrorists are guaranteed legal representation in the American criminal justice system. It's amazing how many people either don't understand this or pretend not to understand it, because it's one of the tenets that made America so great to begin with, at least on paper

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

New Zealand? It's called the "Citizen's Advice Bureau" but it's free for anyone. Doesn't go as far as full representation, but it's something.

Also our conservative government tried to defund it. Fuckers.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Wait until they look at their 401K, if they have one.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 3 points 5 hours ago

It's now a 401.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Get fucked MAGA traitors.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Suspend habeas corpus" is making me pretty upset

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah it feels like that's getting glossed over but that's a really fucking big deal.

For those unaware, habeas corpus (from Medieval Latin, lit. 'you should have the body', basically 'bring us this guy') is a legal procedure that exists in basically every legitimate government anywhere, not just American, which effectively states that if you've been wrongly imprisoned then your lawyer can call to have you moved from prison to a courtroom to determine whether your detainment is lawful. Basically saying you can't just be thrown in a dungeon to be forgotten about because someone can force the court to retrieve you and give you a court date. I'm not a legal expert so read it for yourself to get a good understanding.

At any rate, someone recommending suspending habeas corpus is never up to any good, it is always 100% bad without exception, always. Even saying those three words together should be instant political suicide and should be grounds for disbarment. Successfully suspending habeas corpus with your rubber stamp and signature should be subject to execution. Any judge who accepts that it is suspended is unfit for their position.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Agreed... that's some Gestapo shit

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“We live in a society where foreign alien terrorists have unlimited free legal representation,” Stephen Miller posted.

Did I stutter, bitch?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

Fantastic series.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The scene is from HBO's "John Adams", is that correct? Man, what a show! It made me put John Adams among top 5 American presidents. And the role is Paul Giamatti's finest! I have also changed my view of him as one of the best actors! Had the show been released few years later in late 00's to early 10's during the peak of TV dramas, Paul Giamatti would be celebrated as one of the greatest along with Brian Cranston!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 14 hours ago

I have also changed my view of him as one of the best actors!

Same, this series made me a huge fan of Giamatti, and I try to watch everything he's in now. He's so good.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 192 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an outsider looking in.. aren't they always in full meltdown mode?

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 97 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah, but right now it's about SCOTUS. Sometimes it's other stuff.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 151 points 1 day ago (7 children)

“We live in a society where foreign alien terrorists have unlimited free legal representation,” Stephen Miller posted.

Yes, that's exactly the point.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 143 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I believe I saw someone say on Tumblr that if you enjoy having rights then you should advocate the strongest for criminals enjoying rights as well, because otherwise, the Government can always just take your rights away by labelling you a criminal.

Or, as has been trendy lately, a Salvadoran gang member.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, Thats what I've been saying.

You only have as many rights as an accused criminal does.

and if we can remove due process from someone who is accused of being a criminal, and sent them to a central american torture prison with no judge, jury, hearing, or anything... Then anyone can be sent to a central american torture prison, because all it will take is a baseless accusation to strip you of all your supposedly inalienable rights.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We live in a society where criminals have the right to a free public defender 😱

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago

Woah, so criminals have the right to fair representation, a fair trial, and in some cases a court of ones peers? :0

Naurr, who cares about constitutionally protected rights like due process when you're a dictator. Those freedoms just get in the way of ~~turning America into a christofascist dystopia~~ making America great again

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A public defender who's overworked and probably not even that ~~good~~ effective at his job. You must have a weak case to be concerned about a free lawyer.

Edit: Calling public defenders "not good" is a bit low but they are overworked and under-supported, therefore I rephrased to say they're ineffective.

[–] mako@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

not even that good at his job

There's no need to shit on public defenders to make your point.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fair criticism. Edited my post.

[–] mako@lemmy.today 6 points 14 hours ago

Dude. You're a badass.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Stephen Miller is a whiny little bitch. Literally watch any interview, and tell me I’m wrong. 😂 What a cruel and stupid little man.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Considering how many people they arrest and claim to be terrorists that's a good thing.

Break a window on a Tesla? Terrorist!

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Speak Spanish, believe it or not, also terrorist.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Go to University and study anything but STEM or Economics or not be a white christian male? Straight to gitmo.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago

Buy a Chicago Bulls hat at a thrift store and have brown skin?

Well, you all know the drill by now.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

MAGA supporter shooting at a school: tHouGhtsS aNd PrAyErS.

Dem boycotted a Tesla: MAGA says, “DOMESTIC TERRORISM!”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes I am sure the criminal who already ignores courts amd suffers no tangible consequences for it will obey a ruling he does not like.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The DOJ could technically put an arrest warrant on his subordinates that are not complying with an order.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The trump owned DOJ? Ping me when that happens. I'll hold my breath.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Judges cam also deputize people outside the DOJ and law enforcement to carry out the Court's orders.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I have a higher chance of being a millionaire than that happening

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

And he can pardon them for all crimes and get back to what they were doing. No man, Trump is closer to ending the rule of law than anyone understands.... We have to do the right stuff at the right time or were doing fuhrer 2 electric boogaloo by summer

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The decision has cast the country’s entire legal system as Thanos in the eyes of Trump officials and associated mouthpieces—against whom they have assembled to avenge this perceived national betrayal.

For most people, having the entire legal system as your opponent might give you pause, and an "are we the bad guys?" moment. Not so for Trump cultists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“We live in a society where foreign alien terrorists have unlimited free legal representation,” Stephen Miller posted.

From the US Constitution:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Trump, Miller, and the rest of he administration loathe the Constitution and the very foundations of the American ideal.

They seek to destroy all of it and replace it with a far right oligarchical dictatorship. They want an unchecked executive where the primary qualification of its officers is loyalty to the leader. Where due process is merely a suggestion and doesn't apply to whomever they decide. Where money spent on research, food safety, education, government oversight, and public welfare is corruption and fraud, but money spent on private enterprise that enriches the executive officers is not. And, unfortunately, they've seen more success in that than I would have thought possible, particularly in such a brief time.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

I’m sure they would be upset at this if they could read.

load more comments
view more: next ›