Russia will fuck with the EU.
EU will react with: "Stop it!".
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
Russia will fuck with the EU.
EU will react with: "Stop it!".
The world would improve significantly without Putin. Just sayin'...
The TACO puppet in the US wouldn't be nearly as bold if he didn't have a Russian fist up his ass, for one.
This will probably happen around the same time Israel and Iran escalates. I mean, that is when I would do it.
Could China/Taiwan happen around the same time
It's almost like half the World is going to War
let's just say if you can leave Taiwan, now would be a fantastic time.
well, don't count on the US for help, thats for sure.
Unless nato countries band together and go full force to stop whatever comes their way though, they are in huge amounts of danger. It won't just be Russia coming for them. It will be China, Iran, North Korea, and every other Fascio-dictatorship out there. Possibly even the US, at that point.
I said it before trump got elected in 2016 and no one listened to me. If NATO countries wanted to help themselves, they would have done a lot more to help the US keep its elections legitimate. Instead they did practically nothing.
Possibly even the US? Are you joking? I am completely convinced that right after Russia the US is the next most likely country to invade EU in the next few years. Maybe even more likely as Russia cant make it past Ukraine.
even more reason the EU shouldn't have sat it on its hands while Russia destroyed our country.
So, say that Russia tests article 5. This has one of two possible outcomes.
My point is that this is a MASSIVE risk for Russia if they are wrong, with little concrete and currently achievable upsides if they are indeed right, mainly because they're stuck and bleeding in Ukraine and a logical fallback plan for European nations if NATO turns out to be toothless is to increase support of Ukraine even more, and specifically for the attacked nation it might even make sense to become a military ally of Ukraine since that's an ongoing fight in somebody else's territory.
So to me this sounds like bullshit or this "attack" Kahl is talking about is more of the same which they have already been doing: cyberwar, cutting submarine cables, financing extremist parties. social media disinfo and so on.
It sounds like what most (including me) have said before the conflict in Ukraine. I would personnaly not repeat that mistake and take the words of the BND head very seriously.
If Russia goes for the Baltic countries, it's possible that they have a chance. They have tiny militaries and really depend on Nato.
However, given the current status of the Union, I'm not sure I would be completely confident on Nato. Committing would be politically risky for any politician in the current context.
So while I hope Both unions stand strong (the EU also has a common defence clause), I'm not super confident. Because politicians are extremely short-sighted. And short-sightedness is pretty much what defines our species (that and greed, and stupidity).
And to add upon that, Russia (or more precisely the Russian Federation) has been attacking us for ten years now, maybe more. Article 5 ought to have been invoked before. They should have been dismantled by force years ago. I've said it before, but I'm saying it again: The Russian Federation has to be broken up into its member states, with Russia possibly getting a special treatment. They have to get a government that's under international surveilance for at least 20 years.
I really don't see Russia having a chance against us (Finland), in any short term conflict. We're currently closing in to 900 000 troops in reserve.
Other Baltic countries withdrew from the Ottawa deal too, which means mines, mines, mines.
If the Russians can't breach Ukraine, they sure as hell won't breach the Baltics while simultaneously fighting Ukraine.
Edit: I just realized we aren't considered Baltic these days, even though we were referred as such historically (ww1&2 times).
I was really thinking more of Estonia, Lituania and Latvia. That's what people usually mean by Baltic countries. Finland has already shown Russia that it's probably not a good idea to invade. And I think both the Finns and the Russians haven't forgotten each other.
Putin will do a small attack that involves plausible deniability or doesn't trigger an Article 5 response, then push that a little more later on. He might even deny that it was Russia or he might even use foreign troops to muddy the attack. He is testing NATO.
Still, what exactly does a game of ever increasing "poke the bear" achieve, given the massive risk that the bear gets angry and properly fucks them up?
Russia getting away with it ... until they don't ... is a pretty likely outcome, but the point were they stop getting away with it is almost certainly at or short of territorial invasion, which means that all their getting away with it until reaching that point will have delivered them no concrete gains - it would all be provocation for the sake of provocation until the moment they get mauled.
US forces have already been shot at by Wagner group in Syria
and they got pulverized in response
Be ready. Respond overwhelmingly and immediately
So I guess GPS jamming, Internet cable cutting, spreading misinformation, meddling with elections, Olympic sabotage, gas pipeline sabotage, cyberattacks, etc. etc. don't count?
I think the original article means more of this rather than land invasion. Russia will poke and prod to create chaos and continue destabilize europe.
The was uncertainty has been a huge blow to eastern europe's economy and it'll continue to be so. Economically weak population is more succeptible to proganda so it's easy to see how Russia doesn't need full invasion to hurt eastern europe bad to increase their influence there.
They definitely count as actions designed to test the limits of Article 5.
And by all means, NATo should then remind Russia what article 5 really means. Do not only repel that attack, wipe them out, follow the retreat back into Russia, take a large swaths of Russian territory away as punishment
Fuck Putin