465
‘HIV-ending’ drug could be made for just $25 per patient a year, say researchers
(www.theguardian.com)
Except in the United States, where it will be $1500 a dose.
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
465 points (99.4% liked)
News
30274 readers
4105 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I love your positivism thinking that it would only cost 1500 in the US
But don't worry! If you're fortunate enough to have a job at a good company that pays well, then you can spend $300-$500 of your monthly paycheck to have an insurance company possibly cover up to 80% of the cost! Assuming you are in-network, picked the right plan, followed all the confusing steps to file a claim, and aren't disqualified by one of their dozens of contingencies.
Land of the free babay!
and aren't disqualified by one of their dozens of contingencies
one of which is having HIV
Only 1500?
Well that'll never happen - not when the drug companies can sell $2000 a month or die medication to the inflicted for the rest of their lives.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Infinite breeding here I cum!
But it won’t be
Oh, it will be, but they'll mark it up 100,000%
Then it won't be 25 dollars.
~~Nobody was saying it would be. The headline and article are about production costs at different scales, not prices for anyone buying it after that.~~
Hill had calculated a generic price of $40 annually last year, but said the interest from generic manufacturers had warranted new analysis. This showed lenacapavir could be mass produced for $35 to $46 a year, if there was annual demand for 2m doses, falling to $25 at scaled up production of 5m to 10m doses each year.
Oh wait, I missed a line where the article actually suggests this...
Dr Hill’s research indicates that this gamechanging innovation could – within a year of launch – be produced and sold for just $25 per person per year.
But you're right, they won't sell it for $0 of profit. It would be nice.
No they'll sell it for 50x what an annual treatment regimen costs. That way they can grind down the desperate and still profit off the rich.
It'll cost $25 to produce. Selling cost is another matter entirely.
Can we hurry up with this please. I want to cum buckets in my femboy slut. OK, thx, bye.
Pharma C-suite:
that doesn’t sound very profitable
I fucking wish I was kidding
"But how does this expand shareholder value"
load more comments
(3 replies)
i understand that if it costs $25 to make it then it needs to cost a bit more for supply chain, profits etc (regularly a 50% increase from factory and another 50% increase to retail), but i'll bet you a $500 bottle of HIV-ending drugs that this wont cost $56.25.
That $25 estimate included a 30% profit margin already.
$500 a bottle would be practically giving it away in the US. Most life sustaining meds or the rare cure are sold at unfathomable prices. One of my post-transplant anti rejection meds is $60,000 a month
Let's call it $100 per head.
Hey Elon, you wanna leave behind a legacy that doesn't suck?
Here's your last chance, asshole.
naming your company fucking "Gilead" is some torment nexus-ass shit
the company has been around for a long time, before the book was made famous, one of the first things i saw when applying to lab/biotech was gilead position for scientists. this was already 10 years ago.
they even have transportaiton buses from our city to thier campuses, because its quite far away from a city if you work in biotech.
They are probably referencing the balm.
It looks like that's indeed the case, and they've been around long enough that Handmaid's probably wasn't that well-known at the time. Still, the irony is off the charts... have they considered changing their logo to the traditional four-armed rotationally-symmetric sacred Buddhist symbol? >.>
No they're going with a sonnenrad.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yeah, I grimaced at the name and implications.
At $25-$50/yr with low to no risk of getting HIV I would get the shot. Just like a flu or COVID shot.
Twice yearly shot? Yup, sign me up.
As a medical provider, I'll probably be required to get it.
If this shot were to become common in the gay community, would that just leave the IV drug community to be the main transmitter of HIV? Could we potentially see HIV effectively eradicated?
It's disgusting that drug companies prioritise massive profits over human suffering
They could still profit, just not the truly obscene profits they make, going into the pockets of people who are already rich
Billionaire: But you are wrong. I want them both. Massive profits AND human suffering.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Gilead
Oh, so it's assured they will bleed people dry then, based on this company's track record.
view more: next ›