this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
723 points (97.6% liked)

Science Memes

15572 readers
2647 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

His number are off due to the idea that chicken is cooked at 400F. Yikes!

Hi there and welcome back to another episode of Bitch Slap Kitchen, where we cook food like it owes us money. Today we're making some delicious backhand chicken.

Suspend a whole chicken in midair form some string or something, haul back, and swing at about mach 5, a little less. You're probably not going to have any intact glass anywhere in your house and you'll probably set off some car alarms in the shopping district but you'll have a table ready main course in milliseconds.

[–] sunoc@sh.itjust.works 179 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A guy on YT actually tried it experimentally a few years ago (how many slaps, not how fast one slap); and it works to some degree! The main problem becomes to make a slapping machine that can survive long enough:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFhnnTWMgI&pp=ygURc2xhcCBjb29rIGNoaWNrZW7SBwkJzgkBhyohjO8%3D

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (2 children)

YouTube is truly a wonder of stupidity. Sometimes in good ways

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

He also did a turkey a couple years after that for "slapsgiving"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikiwW9VA9hk

[–] sm1dger@lemmy.world 122 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Typical physicist, ignoring enthalpy of phase changes. Starting from 1C defrosted makes a huge difference from 0C as the melting takes up a ton more energy/slaps. Their underslapped chicken would give you salmonella

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also completely neglecting that not all the energy in a slap will be transferred to thermal energy in the chicken.

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assume a spherical chicken...

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago

tbf modern commercial chickens are basically spherical, the poor bastards

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They haven't considered rate of slap. Significant heat transfer to environment even at 10 slaps per second.

They're also assuming sea level standard atmospheric conditions. You may need to reduce rate of slap at altitude.

[–] marius@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also only about half the heat goes into the chicken and the other half into the hand used for slapping

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I believe we're well on our way to developing the worlds first slap coefficient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And the phase change from uncooked to cooked.

[–] marius@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago

Where do I find cooked in the phase diagram?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sophocles@infosec.pub 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bro really wanted his chicken well done at 400°F

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Naw, that’s burnt.

Maillard reaction where things brown starts at 350f.

More than 165/175 in the center and that’s dried out.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

The mallard reaction is only relevant when cooking duck.

[–] Graphy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you spatchcock your bird then you’ve only gotta slap your cock to about 150°F at the thickest part of breast

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

naturally. Best to slow it down and keep it juicy, too. I like smoking them at about 200 f, it's perfection.

also... way to make spatchcocking sound even dirtier than it is. the no cooks here are probably thinking it's some sort of sex act and the rest of us are wondering if it's not also some sort of sex act.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Gotta love how everyone forgot about Newton in all this. Enjoy your instantly well-cooked hand, which is also made of meat.

[–] weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] head_socj@midwest.social 37 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Lord have mercy on folks cooking their chicken to 400 F. Those birds will come out as dry as the sands of the Sahara.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Common sense and physicists are common enemies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Maybe they like their chicken fucking black

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] laserwash2000@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

The chicken has to exceed the boiling point of water for it to be cooked? Unless we’re making chicken caramels, I don’t think so.

Doing some math, I think it works out to 6,242 slaps or a single slap at 1,939 mph. Much more attainable.

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

That 205C would just be the surface temperature of the chicken, not the average. Note that the calculation doesn't take into account the volume or radius

EDIT: No, I'm wrong. The calculation is for boiling the whole chicken. Who was this written by, a Brit?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 25 points 1 week ago

Who was this written by, a Brit?

Nope. Likely an American.

When cooking, people in general like to use round numbers, like "200°C", since a difference of 5°C in oven temperature is not a big deal.

And yet they went with some oddly specific 205°C. That only makes sense if they're used to Fahrenheit, eyeballed a round value (like 400°F), converted it into Celsius (204.4°C), and then rounded it up to discard the decimal.

I'm also going to say they're completely clueless when it comes to cooking - 200°C is the oven temperature. The chicken itself reaches a far lower temperature, in the 70~80°C range. By the time the chicken reached 200°C, it's already dry and close to catching fire. (The self-ignition temperature for biological stuff is typically between 200°C and 250°C.)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

As your friendly neighborhood person with knowledge about food and cooking, 2 pounds is an absurd weight for an uncooked rotisserie chicken, that is a very small and cooked weight, 4-6 pounds is going to be typical. Also, more importantly, you cannot cook something faster by increasing the temperature past a pretty quick point, meat is an excellent insulator. No slap can cook the inside of a frozen chicken unless the entire chicken disintegrates.

Tbf though, a slap at 3700 mph would absolutely disintegrate the chicken.

[–] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Also, if you cooked it to 400 degrees it would be disgusting. You just need to cook it to 165. This guy might know about physics but he has never cooked anything before.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah yeah we get it, Newton will fry your hand and pls don't cook a chicken to 205°C core temp.

BUT! What kinda physics major forgets Newton AND the fact that you won't convert kinetic energy into heat with 100% efficiency?

I know, three math majors in a trench coat, that's who'll forget it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

But how do you get the chicken back from the stratosphere once you've slapped it that fast?

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You start in the stratosphere and slap it down towards the Earth.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Courantdair@jlai.lu 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At this point we have to consider the ambient temperature as well, as the chicken will slightly cool between two slaps once it exceeds it

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Assume the chicken is spherical an in vacuum.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago

I think we should put more consideration into the fact that slapping the chicken this much will dissipate a lot of energy into deforming the chicken.

[–] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

No one's going to point out the absurd starting assumption KE=mcT??

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Heikki@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

In general, chicken needs to be heated to 74C or 165F for a few seconds to kill off dangerous pathogens.

Here is a list of other times and temperatures for chicken to be considered safe

Also at room temperature, the average speed of atoms in the material is at 400 m/s, at least for a gas. That might give you a hint.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So has anyone who's actually cooked a chicken before done the math? Because my guy just slapped this poor bird into pure carbon. Did he mean to do 205°F? It's still too high, but it would at least be edible.

load more comments
view more: next ›