this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
1162 points (98.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12919 readers
1089 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Can someone explain why so many countries support what’s happening in Palestine? Whats going on behind the scenes here?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Big Israeli lobby. Bribes and Epstein blackmail.

[–] alyth@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Most western countries have committed genocide or invasion in very recent history. Either in the context of WWII, colonialism or economic interests. Countries don't magically change over night. Wouldn't it be more surprising if they didn't support their ally?

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

At risk of sounding like that dipshit Vance, you guys don’t have free speech, not really. The uk seems to exist in a “yes, but no” realm. The press can’t report on trials such that it might influence outcome. 1988 law iirc. That’s smart, but it’s still a guardrail on speech. Some of the arrests and even sentences over there, for speech and sometimes even ideology related infractions, are a bit wild. I remember reading something about a woman being fined for calling her ex a leprechaun on social media.

That said, I feel a need to reiterate how crazy this defense of war and slaughter is. I’ve been a casual observer at best but I do not understand why either government cares if a people across an ocean (who are not and never will be boots on the ground for either side of this war) say they don’t like a war. So what? The war will rage on regardless of wether or not college students in Michigan walk around outside on a nice day holding signs. Or if some guy in London posts an objection on social media. That’s not even a speed bump to this war or either government if either government even sees or hears any of it. So why does either government even care? Why even spend energy on that? For them, it’s like a volume setting that maybe can’t be turned to zero, but in the end it’s just a bit of noise to them. So why bother? The war will continue. As such, their reaction makes no sense whatsoever.

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

I think it makes sense when you consider there are many government workers who do not support the genocide of Palestinians, and would be more vocal about it if they the political capital that, say, a large protest nets you.

It's actually possible to end this with only the ingredients we have available right now.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The Met statement (https://news.met.police.uk/news/update-on-policing-in-london-following-proscription-of-palestine-action-499157) includes a 'report your neighbour' statement; "If you see material supporting terrorism online report it – visit www.gov.uk/ACT

You can also report suspicious activity by contacting the police in confidence on 0800 789 321."

Use this information wisely.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

And i thought police in the V for Vendetta movie was extreme. Reality is a bitch.

[–] Jakule17@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

Luckily I’m not from Terf island (although things aren’t looking so good around here either), but I support Palestine action

[–] tane@lemmy.zip 33 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Every British politician belongs in a mass grave. Just a total stain on humanity

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah but that's been the opinion of the British public since the 1960s. Calling every British politician a useless skidmark (preferably to their face) is as close as we get to patriotism.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

Save some room for the American politicians though please too.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

As long as you don't touch Corbyn

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Bah, he can get in the sea as well, he supported brexit

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Dangerous and many voted against it. We already had politicians dead across both sides of the pond. Shouldn't be encouraging this BS.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Time to make a new group and to spite them call it "palestine 2 action"

[–] alt_xa_23@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

2 Palestine 2 Action

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 21 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

There are few things I like about being an American, but one of them is the first amendment. It doesn't always work, and Trump is sure to try some shit like this soon, but at least I know for now I won't go to prison for saying that I do indeed support Palestine Action

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

As long they can send people to torture prisons without due process or evidence, we do NOT have a First Amendment.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Or a 5th or 14th amendment

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 56 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You could absolutely go to prison for it. A group of people in an unmarked van can grab you, send you to a prison in your country or even somewhere else, where you will be tortured possibly to death, and even if there will be an international fuss about it, nobody will ever do anything about it.
There is no more laws in your country, none.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I could, because our rights are not bulletproof. That said, it's not a given that I will go to jail for being against genocide

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's not given in the UK either. At least they still have the ability to challenge that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 43 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I'm more shocked it hasn't already happened to Extinction Rebellion, Insulate Britain or Just Stop Oil.

But I guess blockading motorways and rocking up to art museums dressed like extras from a Wham music video and defacing paintings makes you less of a threat than wanting Netanyahu to stop his genocide of the Palestinian people.

[–] laserm@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Still, calling blocking motorways and defacing painting terrorism is a stretch.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 50 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Not only is the ruling wrong - it is the very thing it claims to be opposing. It is itself an act of terrorism, carried out with the intention of inspiring fear in the British public to further a political agenda.

In every way, the British government is replicating the actions it accuses PA of - except that the scale of harm to British society and the terror inspired is magnitudes greater, and performed in service of the opposite political goal.

This is a terror attack by the government against the British people.

The British people's opinion and will are the thing from which the goverment gains it's only source of legitimacy - and they do not line up with the government on this issue.

But evidently the government believes in a different model of legitimacy: they believe that legitimacy is derived from the mere fact that they hold power. In the mind of the government and it's supporters, the difference between a terrorist organisation and a legitimate government is just power and only power. To them, right and wrong has absolutely nothing to do with it. They think that they are winning, and that they are going to get away with it. Nothing else matters.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 19 hours ago

But evidently the government believes in a different model of legitimacy: they believe that legitimacy is derived from the mere fact that they hold power.

*Macht macht Recht"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 107 points 1 day ago (32 children)

Just to be clear because everybody seems to be missing this point.

Palestinian Action, is an organisation. Membership of that group is banned, it is not illegal to support Palestinians or to call out Israel's genocide. The government doesn't like it when you do, but it's not actually illegal for you to do it.

This organisation broke into a UK air force base in order to protest. They are not being charged because they protested, they're being charged for breaking in and damaging a lot of military equipment. I think it's a bit far to call them terrorists, but you can sort of see the government's point, if you squint.

The UK government does however absolutely deserve to get it in the neck for their support of Israel. Labour have had a pretty awkward relationship with Israel in particular and anti-Semitism in general for a long time, and they're now keen to be seen as supporters, but there are limits.

[–] JustTheWind@lemmy.world 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for this clarification. This is an extremely important context. "Palestine Action" is the particular name of a very specific organization, so the title of the article is obviously a bit misleading.

Still very worrying and more than a bit concerning, though. Here's to hoping for a future strengthening of UK speech laws. Though, frankly, I'm not so sure about US speech laws anymore. Cheers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)

and they are already jailing people

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 34 points 23 hours ago

That's good reason to remind people, that law is written by particular people, mostly to protect those people interests.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 30 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Feeding, housing and guarding someone for 14 years has got to be ridiculously expensive. All for uttering a few words.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

Does the colonies have too much power over The Commonwealth?

load more comments
view more: next ›