this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
250 points (89.8% liked)

Technology

72829 readers
2813 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Ingenious name. I feel like Bitchat should be connected somehow with PenIsland.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

If you want to bitch at someone, there's an app for that

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 days ago
[–] lemonuri@infosec.pub 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is already a really good foss app that does exactly that, it's called briar and is as secure and private as it gets. The downside with p2p communication apps being, that they eat your phones battery for breakfast. Still a good option for activists or journalists I think. It's a good way to get around the "server in the middle" problem. Still more convenient to run your own (xmpp) server at home imho...

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

** for Android (and Windows/macOS/Linux) but not iOS.

And apparently never going to be as some key component is written in Java. Other technical obstacles should be solvable (like f.ex. getting continuous running in bg by exploiting location services like iSH can do)

[–] lemonuri@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Thanks, I did not realise that. So this app is for Mac to Mac communication only. If seems for briar you need to run a server still or messages will get lost between mobile users. How does this new app solve that problem? On mobile phones disconnects will happen regularly as network coverage changes and different network towers connect and disconnect when you are on the move. You might as well spin up your own xmpp server at that point, as that protocol is tried and tested for over 20 years and very lightweight and battery friendly as well...

[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 1 points 4 days ago

One runs a mailbox app on any old disused android phone, it temporary stores content and deliver it to the main unit once the connection is restored.

Bit simpler to install an app and scan a qr code for the average user compared to even configuring an XMPP client IMO.

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I once did some programming on the Cybiko, a device from 2000 that could form a wireless mesh network with peers. The idea was that you could have a shopping mall full of teens and they'd be able to chat with each other from one end to the other by routing through the mesh. It was a neat device!

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I wanted a cybiko so bad as a teen. It seemed like it would be so cool if everyone I knew bought one. Of course no one did, but I still think they are awesome.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

For all those little bitches.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

don't nazis already have telegram

[–] Pro@programming.dev 7 points 6 days ago

Now they have a second option.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Have a look at meshtastic. Yes, you do have to get a separate device, but range on it can be several tens to hundreds of miles depending on the mesh density.

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah my first thought when I read the headline was "why not just use meshtastic?"

In practice range seems to be a few kilometers, in places with lots of nodes.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Phone makers need to add LoRa radios to phones. Something like this would be more useful then.

[–] icegladiator@lemy.lol 2 points 6 days ago

We already have Briar. I don't get why Jack Dorsey is trying to get into the messaging space so hard. He also bankrolls SimpleX Chat if anyone is familiar with that platform

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 158 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Let's build an app to liberate communications but only release it inside a closed garden. Great idea

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

In the context of the US fascist dictatorship and Apple being the dominant smartphone there, starting with Apple makes sense.

If it can be done within Apples curated monopoly, it will be technically possible on Android (probably).

[–] Eldritch@piefed.social 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't trust Jack. But this does seem marginally interesting. Actually decentralized, no servers supposedly. We'll have to see. Again I sure as hell I'm not going to trust dorsey. And he's got it under some cringey edgelord "unlicense" license which basically appears to be MIT just with a different name. The actual concept seems intriguing. But definitely nothing to get excited about currently.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

One thing I personally like more about this than about Briar - routing of messages.

It seems Briar exchanges state of the groups with the neighboring devices, they with their neighbors, and so on.

That might take a few iterations (thus delay) to propagate a message from, say, one side of the crowd to another, and leave different members with different state all the time.

While here, apparently, messages are routed further immediately. From my own toying around - not the best thing too, but initiating synchronization by sender\relay and not by recipient seems sane.

Maybe should rewrite the toy to be nicer. It seems to be closer to real world things than I thought.

[–] Pro@programming.dev 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And he's got it under some cringey edgelord "unlicense" license which basically appears to be MIT just with a different name.

Bro, Public Domain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sit_up_straight@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

youtube-dl and yt-dlp are under unlicense. it's just boilerplate legalese for public domain

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 102 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 75 points 1 week ago

Bitch At

Lmao

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Bit chat

Bitch at

Being Jack Dorsey, I'm going with the latter.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

messaging app that works over Bluetooth mesh networks. No internet

So he's made a shitty version of Briar and crammed crypto into it?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

In this context I think "crypto" means your message is encrypted across hops, not that you have to pay to send/receive messages.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago

Just wait for AI enhancements.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Briar doesn’t have an iOS client an never will

This doesn’t have an android client 😀

[–] redhat421@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Interesting. I wonder why Briar won't have an iOS client?

[–] BackwardsUntoDawn@infosec.pub 5 points 6 days ago

I'm sure the background limitations are a big part, but I wonder if there's also limits to what they can do with bluetooth

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zapzap@lemmings.world 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If you're in Bluetooth range can't you chat with your mouths? Or is it for secretly chatting when you're in a group of people? I don't get the use case.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 12 points 6 days ago

It's not about you being in bluetooth range of the person you want to talk to, it's about all the people sitting in between you both that pass the message along without touching the internet.

So you can be on a cargo ship, or on a remote island, with 20 other people and all use chat. If 1 person has internet, then you can all chat globally as well.

It's the same basic method of how airtags work. Everyone with an iPhone connects to the airtag and passes data to Apple. It's just done in the background, so users don't ever notice.

Could be useful on a plane: If you have different seats than someone and don't want to pay for your airline's ridiculous data prices. Although, most airlines I fly on(american, delta, air canada, united) all have free RCS/Facebook/Whatsapp, but not necessarily Signal, Telegram, Matrix, or your preferred secure service.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›