this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
409 points (99.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8260 readers
575 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The speaker of the house and Zionist-first Mike Johnson will probably kill this. It would be nice to see if the democrats would vote this through if they gain the house in 2026. My guess, they would not. Epstein had "friends" on both sides of the aisle.

Source on X

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IttihadChe@lemmy.ml 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Why would the Democrats vote this through in 2026. Epstein was murdered during Trump's first term, in 2019.

The Dems had a house majority from 2019-2023 and never released it.

From 2021-2023 they had the house, the Senate tiebreaker, and the presidency...

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's because bill clinton is also on the list.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Pretty sure Bill Gates and maybe Bezos are on there too. Not sure on Bezos, it's been a while. They're protecting the gravy train in any case.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Of course there is! Haven’t you been listening to Trump?!?

The Epstein files are on Pam Bondi's desk right now but also they do not exist but also they do exist because they were written by Obama and Hillary when Epstein killed himself in 2019 when Trump was president.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In other news, we've always been at war with Eastasia.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I'm thankful the chocolate ration has been raised to 20 grams a week

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Schrödinger's File.

The files exist in a range of potential states, in what is called a "superposition" and can essentially be thought of as all of them at once, although weighted to acknowledge that some states are more likely than others.

The files actually don't have any pages until an observation is made.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Probably was. If his name was on it, it was destroyed to the best of his ability in 2019. He just gets worried that he missed something.

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If nothing else, it'll force old democrats who'd rather be Republicans to choose between their precious donors and the people they're supposed to serve

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

Ah, Mondays.

[–] crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

Is this from a stand up routine? If so, please share lol

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

They're going to say it's a "distraction" and vote against it. As if forcing the FBI to do something other than snatch brown people off the street is bad.

That won't be a very hard choice for them, lol.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

That hasn’t stopped them before.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago

Stay away from the windows, Ro.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sadly, Johnson can and will squash this, but I applaud Ro Khanna for introducing it.

If only this were somehow privileged.

A privileged resolution is a type of resolution that deals with the internal operations, rules, or constitutional duties of the House. Under House Rule IX, these can be brought directly to the floor by any member, without needing the Speaker’s approval.

Types of Privileged Resolutions in the U.S. House:

  • Impeachment of a president or other civil officer
  • Censure or reprimand of a House member
  • Contempt of Congress (for defying subpoenas, etc.)
  • Expulsion of a member (requires two-thirds vote)
  • Challenges to the seating or election of a member
  • Changes to the House rules
  • Questions of privilege (issues affecting the dignity or functioning of the House)
  • Resolutions of inquiry (demanding information from the executive branch)
[–] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

Maybe they can do a resolution of inquiry as a first step, demanding the executive branch provide the document to congress.

[–] Bread@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, considering the point is to out those who who deny it. If Johnson squashes it, mission accomplished, no? Easy target on your back for not doing something that would be morally right. I wouldn't want to be the guy that is known to be responsible for that when there are lots of crazy and pissed people out there.

[–] Resedit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s cute. He thinks the files have not been destroyed.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

Forcing a vote is good for optics regardless

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago

This is an obvious misinformation dodge. A classic propaganda technique. You are either a stooge of the state or a useful idiot. If you resent both of those labels, please do not reinforce this propaganda spin any further.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Oh shoot, when the DOGEies were here they must have deleted it all. No biggie though, there was nothing interesting in it at all...."

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] edel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

If there is such a compromising "list" it would have been made disappear long ago so I would not even demand "the list". Now, there should be a report if what was confiscated from Epstein and some form of proof it has not been tampered with, that is what should be demanded.

seems like kayfabe

What are the means by which the regime's dictator would be removed should he be found to have done what we all know he did? None? We're still fucked and we still need to [scene missing] because the regime has absolute power over the government of the colonies.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I can accept nothing important existed in the first place but they can't just switch it up after hammering into peoples heads for so long