this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
394 points (97.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

8629 readers
2650 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 74 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Someone explain to an EU pleb like me

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 130 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Zohran is a radical socialist by American standards and Andrew is the poster boy for the rich and famous. Zohran won the democratic nomination for mayor of NY by a landslide, and looks poised to do the same with the election. Andrew is running as a third party because he's butt hurt that money won't save him.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 98 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Andrew is running as a third party because he’s butt hurt that money won’t save him.

And because the DNC wants to split the vote to send a lesson to anybody left of Kissinger.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To an extent, sure, but surprisingly a lot of the DNC have backed him up. Give them credit where it's due, which isn't often so it doesn't take much effort. If you give them shit for stuff they aren't doing then they have no reason to not do the bad stuff, because it has the same result.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

surprisingly a lot of the DNC have backed him up

You have any evidence of that?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes

Manhattan Democrats — the borough’s official Democratic organization, overseeing 30 local Democratic clubs — voted overwhelmingly to support Mamdani after he appeared at their meeting Monday evening. They are the third county Democratic group to endorse Mamdani, after the Brooklyn Democratic Party, which had previously endorsed former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary, and the Staten Island Democratic Party.

[–] match@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

what does the N in DNC stand for?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

First I want to point out you aren't asking for proof against it, but fine.

I can't find exactly what I'm looking for, because Mamdani ~~said~~ didn't condemn people who said "globalize the antifada," but here's the DNC chair not speaking against that at least. He's said basically that Democrats need to support him no matter what before, but this is the big thing right now that's making it hard to search for.

I'm much further left than the DNC (social anarchist), but "the party" is mostly doing the right thing here. That's not to say the donors are though. I think most of the monied people are with Cuomo.

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He never said “globalize the intifada”. You’re parroting Zionist propaganda.

He simply declined to condemn the phrase. There’s a huge difference. Get it straight and cut it out with your lies.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Ah, I didn't even read it because I didn't really care if he did or didn't, and it wasn't what I was looking for. I think it's perfectly fine to say.

So this is actually about the DNC not condemning Mamdani not condemning other people saying that. That's too stupid.

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don’t get why people are making a big deal out of the intifada thing. Who gives a shit that he said it? These idiots wouldn’t have any problem if he said “we need to bring everyone around the world together to rise against oppression”

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago

it's because of the islamophobia

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Who gives a shit that he said it?

He didn't say it. That's the flex his opponents are trying to make.

You know how Republicans are trying to flex on their cult by asserting the Epstein files don't actually exist? Same tactic.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you aren't asking for proof against it

well for one i heard establishment democrat andrew cuomo is looking to run third party. can't quite find the source right now but i remember hearing it somewhere

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Yes, he is. He isn't the DNC though.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And because the DNC wants to split the vote to send a lesson to anybody left of ~~Kissinger~~ Friedman.

Ftfy

Oh, they can try.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And the "ratio" refers to looking at twitter engagement (e.g. retweets, likes, replies) relative to the tweet

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I should have been more specific in my question. What did Mamdani reply with?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

A link to contribute to his campaign, because if Andrew is truly in it to win it for the Democratic party then he would line up instead of running against Mamdani

[–] devdoggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

To a "contribute" link, which, I assume, leads to somewhere where you can contribute to his campaign.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for that - I never really understood it. So is this an example of a good or bad ratio? (I don't eX-Twitter at all, this is the extent of my social media presence)

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The ratio just refers to how the original tweet has far less likes/quotes/retweets than the follow up reply. An example here would be having two lemmy comments, one as a reply, and the reply has significantly more upvotes. So the "ratio" of who has the most upvotes/likes/quotes etc shows what the overwhelming opinion is. In this specific case the original tweet has just over 4k likes while the response tweet has 133k

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Zohran is a radical socialist by American standards...

Which means he'd be a pretty milquetoast centrist in countries with less insane political systems.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

I don't use this social media and am guessing little on the symbols, but I think the ratio is referring to likes for each.

Mandani- 133k likes

Cuomo: 4.2k likes

Also, Mandani replied to the sex pest so everyone that viewed Mamdani's post saw Cuomo's and had the opportunity to like it. A reply having 30x the likes of the one it replied to is wild.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Quomo would go on to lose the vote to Mamdani. By a lot.

[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

This is recent (yesterday), it's after the primary that Mamdani won. Cuomo is still running as a third party candidate.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Fuck dynastic political families.

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 6 points 1 week ago

In it to spoil him