this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
669 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

8884 readers
1587 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 54 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

If you bring a milkshake in opposite backyards that are equally distant, will the boys be suspended between both atraction fields uncapable of moving as if it was some sort of lactic lagrange point or would both milkshakes repeal each other until their fields are no longer superposing?

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's an unstable equilibrium, any external force will disturb it and lead to the boys being pulled into one of the milkshakes

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This implies a pair of rotating milkshakes can be used to suspend the boys

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Exercise 3.1: Compute the lagrange points for boys near two rotating milkshakes. For extra credit show that it's better than yours.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

'lactic Lagrange point' got my upvote

[–] bstix 4 points 3 weeks ago

Aka cleavage.

[–] DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The boys would follow the more tempting milkshake. One boy would divide from the group to scout out the less tempting milkshake at close proximity.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

But the boys of summer have gone...

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 weeks ago

What a great last line.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not only if they're back in town, but also if they're the backstreet boys.

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

I think they are the backstreet boys because I was at a pay phone trying to call home when I saw them on their way to the milkshake yard

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

There's a good chance that if it's summer the boys are present. After summer, the boys are gone.

I could teach you but I'd have to charge.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

…And whether or not the boys are currently transitioning II Men.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If it has been raining men then they are probably in all the yards.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At least we know for sure that they don't cry.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well of course they don't cry, they're imaginary.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Are you saying they are complex?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Fundamentally flawed of course - clearly you can crack a cold one in the yard all by yourself. The presence of the boys is not required, and in fact is a downside since they will consume your remaining cold ones and then go look for milkshakes without so much as a thank you ma'am.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The boys are not only back in town, but looking for trouble.

[–] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fuckin’ Jack-of-all-trades Stan and Jimmy the Garbageman. Good shit

[–] ezterry@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

I was just assuming a yard glass of milkshake next to a yard glass of beer. Not sure the image went away when it became clear the author intended a suburban yard.