this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
539 points (83.2% liked)

Comic Strips

18540 readers
1368 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 248 points 1 week ago (24 children)

What that actually looked like:

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 150 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (24 children)

A perfectly designed test - ambiguous enough that anyone subjected to it can be failed.

I still don't know what #11 is "supposed" to be.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 40 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I think it's supposed to say "Cross out the digit necessary", so one digit, in which case cross out the 1 because there's enough 0's that crossing out one 0 isn't enough.

It's 10 that has me confused. Is it asking for the last letter of the first word that starts with 'L' in that sentence? It doesn't actually specify.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would assume each question is independent of the others, so probably a T for 'last'

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] THB@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Can anyone explain #1 to me? What are you supposed to circle? It says "the number or the letter". There's 1 number and the entire sentence is literally letters...

It's like when the waiter asks "Soup or salad?" and you say "Yes".

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Circle? It clearly says draw a line around whatever you decided wrongly to indicate. Lines don't curve and aren't boxes, so good luck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

And 13 is unclear if it's strictly 'more than' or 'more than or equal'

[–] doughless@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's on purpose - white skin? it can be either one; otherwise both are wrong.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 20 points 1 week ago

You actually weren't subjected to literacy tests "if your grandfather was eligible to vote", ie your grandfather was a white citizen.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also worth pointing out, WHY the test is so bad... 1. obviously not even well educated people today can agree on the meaning of a good portion of the questions.

but the biggest thing is, not everyone had to take them... IE the key point intention was "if a parent or grandparent has ever voted, you can skip this test". which is such a blatant giving away that they don't care of an individuals knowledge, they aren't actually worried if they can read, they were just keeping first generation voters from voting... at a time when in particular a specific subset of american's were in position to be first generation voters.

[–] match@pawb.social 38 points 1 week ago

(black people, particularly)

[–] match@pawb.social 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are two more pages to this and it gets worse

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago

Prove you're literate by solving lateral thinking word puzzles.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 204 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If voting needed an exam, they would use that exam to stop certain demographics from voting. And no, I'm not talking about the ignorant.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago

They used to do this and it turned out exactly how you describe. I would probably also add it’d incentivize politicians to dismantle educational institutions serving certain demographics

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Surely there are no examples in American history that voting eligibility exams were used to stop certain demographics from voting.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 91 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It is 100% used as a weapon to disenfranchise voters.

I do however believe that it should be used on CANDIDATES.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Who gets to design the test, though?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is the one fear, especially considering... a now controlling amount of politicians can't accept basic facts... so we'd see questions like "is climate change real", "how old is the earth".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 75 points 1 week ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 58 points 1 week ago (21 children)

Fuck no. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test

Between the 1850s and 1960s, literacy tests were used as an effective tool for disenfranchising African Americans in the Southern United States. Literacy tests were typically administered by white clerks who could pass or fail a person at their discretion based on race. Illiterate whites were often permitted to vote without taking these literacy tests because of grandfather clauses written into legislation.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] eluvatar@programming.dev 55 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Who determines the questions and answers? Now they are the ones determining who can vote and thus the people in control.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Sure. Disenfranchise most people. That's a suitable hack to a
checks notes
stable, legitimate, and responsive government.

Even China would have more political legitimacy than such a system. It would collapse almost immediately.

If you ever want a good example of functionalist ideas leading to absolutely uncritical nonsense, here it is.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (19 children)

This is a bad idea. You would just be creating another layer of gerrymandering.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 43 points 1 week ago

Nah, the exams wouldn't be mandatory for everyone. You have a degree? Exempt. You graduated from one of the "certified" high schools (the ones in white neighborhoods but we don't call it that wink wink)? Exempt. Passed NRA shooting license exam? Exempt.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

They used to do that in the US during the Jim Crow era. It went predictably.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Keep trying, Jay. One day you'll make a funny comic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The exam:

Q. What is the secret password? A. Make America Great Again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)

the main function of the contemporary media: to convey the message that even if you’re clever enough to have figured out that it’s all a cynical power game, the rest of America is a ridiculous pack of sheep.

This is the trap.

-David Graeber, The Democracy Project

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Brazil had something like that in the early republic days, only literate people could vote. Needless to say, only the robber baron elites kept getting elected, also thanks to the significant amount of fraud that happened. "The election is won during the counting"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

And the approved voters just happened to be from the 50 people who controlled the testing.

[–] bremen15@feddit.org 22 points 1 week ago (9 children)

It's not working. We have relatively equal education in Germany, and we have plenty of intelligent, educated people voting far right.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

If I recall correctly, Aristotle proposed something like only the educated being able to vote. I think if everyone was guaranteed free access to both a high school and college education, along with all food and living costs covered for anyone studying, then I could see having at least any associates level degree being an okay barrier of entry to voting.

However, such a thing would need to be protected by some unremovable barriers. For instance, education would need to continue receiving appropriate funding, food and other living costs such as renting a room would need to be covered even as the cost for these things change. People with disabilities would need to receive proper accommodations.

A caveat I’ll add is that there would need to be more community colleges built and much more funding for pre-K thru 12th grade as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The founding fathers basically solved this issue through the electoral college, you’re not supposed to be voting for the president, you’re supposed to be voting for the people who will elect the president. But that’s all gone to shit, proving Hamilton’s warnings about populism extremely prescient.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›