this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
653 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

17622 readers
1511 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

This is a tough one. First, I don't think MPs shoupd be landlords, but:

  • She wanted to sell the house
  • She waited until the renters contract expired
  • She did offer a rolling contract to the current renters at their existing rent until the house sold
  • They declined
  • She put the house on the market and opened it up to any short-term renters who wanted to stay there while it was on the market
  • She listed it for current going rate
  • Someone took it
  • The house is still for sale.

To me, there isn't much wrong with that, what is wrong is:

  • She didn't wait 6 months. Not only is this terrible, but the optics are horrible and she should know that
  • She is using a tenant agency that tried to charge them a ton of move-out fees (She did have them canceled)

And..

She's the HOMELESSNESS MINISTER?!?! Sheash.

Edit: Some additional context from UK peoples - some letting agencies will relist your home without telling you. Fun stuff.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

update: this article caused her to resign from her Ministerial position the next day.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 154 points 1 week ago (1 children)

homelessness minister

well yes she's making people homeless, job well done

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 32 points 1 week ago

Damnit. Beat me to it. But the joke basically wrote itself so.. :D

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 92 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe she misunderstood and didn’t realize she’s supposed to reduce homelessness.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but if she doesn't keep making more people homeless she'll be out of a job!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Then she’ll be homeless! Which increases homelessness numbers! So they’ll have to give her a job again. But then she won’t be homeless anymore.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

schrodinger's homelessness

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Turkeys don't vote for Christmas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All landlords are bastards.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I own two properties that I let out. I never cheat my tenants, it's bad for business. So (though I hate to put it like this): not all landlords.

Only 99%.

[–] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Lemmy usees hate you for it but they can't imagine someone just temporarily needing to rent a place instead of buying it and being stuck there. It's a logical exchange between a homeowner and a (temporary) home seeker so please ignore the hate hahaha.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

@phutatorius@lemmy.zip @the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world

Depends, even if you're a nice landlord who treats tenants fairly, if you're voting for things that make house prices higher, or the rental market tighter, then you're an arsehole.

If you're using periods of rapid rental inflation to also massively raise the rent, then fuck you. If you're standing in the way of up-zoning, fuck you. If you leave your rental empty for a long time because you're looking for at or above market rents, fuck you.

However, if you're just playing the capitalist game at the kiddie tables (2 properties like juuuuuust counts, maybe), while doing everything else in your power to work against capitalism, then I'm willing to grant there being landlords who aren't arseholes, just people living in the system.

Don't hate the player, hate the game, and hate the players who aren't trying to undo the game in some way.

I'm inclined to agree not all landlords are bad, just most.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

FIY, the Minister's party (Labour) is currently pushing a law to increase tenants' rights, including preventing this exact situation from happening, which makes the whole situation even more ridiculous and hypocritical.

Labour’s Renters’ Rights Bill, which will become law next year, prohibits landlords who have ended a tenancy in order to sell a property from relisting it for higher rent until at least six months after tenants have moved out.

[–] needanke@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

Sounds better than nothing but why even make it legal to evict tenants to sell a place in the first place?

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 23 points 1 week ago

Labour is a deeply unserious party that is trying to revert to Blairism. They want to look like they are doing something, but don't actually want to change anything.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It’s also the party who willingly sent hundreds of thousands of disabled people including children into poverty. So not too off brand either.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Is she trying to get in on this before the law passes?

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

Always a nice change of pace seeing terrible politicians from outside the US. Terrible for our outlook as a species, but a nice change of scenery none the less.

She resigned rather than keep the rents low. She’s just gonna go full evil landlord now

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should rebrand to the “Work or Starve” party.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 17 points 1 week ago

Or Work And Still Starve at the rate they're going

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As a Canadian, sensitive question but how come everyone in the government and labor party is Indian nowadays? Im just curious as I’ve noticed it as I read these stories

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

fellow Canadian, have you been to Toronto/Southern Ontario lately?

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The UK has a lot of ethnic Indians because of the empire and encouraging immigration to replace people who didn't survive WWII. The Labour Party has about as many people with Indian heritage as would be expected given population demographics. It's probably just more than in Canada, so it seems like a lot to you.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never connected it to the post ww2 population decline but it makes sense, thanks

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

There was no significant population decline during or after WW2.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/population-of-england-millennium?time=1900..2016

Much of the effect of young men of working age getting killed off was mitigated by increased participation in the workforce by women.

Mirgration from the subcontinent had much more to do with the demand for cheap labour by manufacturers in the early 20th century, especially the textile industry, and by public services during the period of postwar rebuilding.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago

Minister for homelessness, previous experiences appreciated.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My landlord did this. He said he wanted to sell the place, then rented it again at a way higher price. Very illegal, but I moved out of the city - hard to do small claims from so far away.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being a landlord should automatically disqualify you from that position

I agree. Being a landlord should automatically disqualify you from being a landlord.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look up France-Élaine Duranceau, minister of housing in Québec, Canada. Another fine example.

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yep, she's completely disconnected from reality. She bought her 700k$ house cash at like 30 something, cannot understand why people does not invest in real estate. She would be the one saying "are you trying not being poor?"

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

She will say "try not being poor"?

[–] Pudutr0n@feddit.cl 13 points 1 week ago

Guess she meant something different with "unreasonable rent increases".

[–] Mike_Hunt@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

what a cunt

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Incredible. In the worst way.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Seems pretty credible to me.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look... If you own housing with the express purpose of using it as a means of income or financial gain/stability then you're objectively a piece of human shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Redditsux@piefed.ca 6 points 1 week ago
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Awful, but unfortunately happens a lot.

I bought my home two years ago in anticipation of my now former landlord selling the building, which he did last year. I didn't want to get priced out of living in the place I wanted to be.

load more comments
view more: next ›