this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
285 points (98.0% liked)

Political Memes

9136 readers
1752 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The basilisk is not going to like this.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Aww, what’s it gonna do? Cry? Piss its circuits?

Dumb clanker.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There will never be a more perfect two comment combo than you two right here

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I wish you the best.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That has to be the stupidest piece of creepy pasta too.

Even if a crazy advanced AI took over, it wouldn't do anything without a payoff and whether or not it puts anyone in cyber jail it wouldn't change anything.

It would be a waste of resources out of a spite. An incredibly human thing and something AI will likely never be capable of

But those idiots don't understand anything about what they worship. So they they can't pick out the obvious flaws with their own argument

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Are you calling it "creepy pasta" to express your disapproval of the concept or because you think it's an actual creepy pasta?

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s creepypasta for people who think Pascal’s wager becomes much more convincing if you give it sci fi window dressing, lol.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

"Deep state conspiracies" also fits.

Related: Some people read the The Last Question and think it is in support of monotheism and intelligent design

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Por que los dos?

I don't view it any different than the kids who killed a classmate to impress Slenderman.

Someone made up an urban legend, and now people believe it.

Like, you do know that the origin is an Internet forum like 15 years ago right?

Youve got me curious now, what do you think it is?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No los dos.

I don't know, I see a difference between a cReEpY thing posted in some random forum for fun and a thought experiment that provoked years of discussion. But I don't know enough about the subject to meaningfully comment on it, however you may categorise it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I see a difference between a cReEpY thing posted in some random forum for fun and a thought experiment that provoked years of discussion

It's literally the same thing...

But I don’t know enough about the subject to meaningfully comment on it

Yet you're literally commenting on it...

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Sure. 50 Shades of Grey and The Lord of the Rings are both books, literally the same thing.

I am commenting on the way you talk about it. Or rather inquiring about it.

[–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Was AI actually being used in any mental health services? I know there've been a lot of articles lately about AI fucking people up when acting as their therapist but I've always assumed that was in the context of "person doesn't have a real therapist, goes to chatgpt.com and vents to it on their own time", not "person is receiving professional help, which then has them talk to ChatGPT".

So in other words: Is this law actually doing anything? Or is it a pointless law targeting something that doesn't happen, so politicians can say they've done something without actually having done so?

Yes there are models and sites specifically advertising as AI therapists.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This "clanker" thing is so cringe. Stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Care to explain what clanker is to me? Also for a heads up your comment posted twice.

I do kind of like the term fetch though, but I get the reference. I didnt see it till I was drunk in my early 30s though

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's a term people are trying to turn into a slur for either AI or people who use AI, depending on the circumstances. It seems to come from the Clone Wars show where it's used derisively to refer to battle droids.

Thanks for the heads up, I deleted the duplicate comment.

yeah, we've been using Toaster for decades. get with the frelling program.

Ah gotcha. So I don't want language models shoved into everything but if someones going to use a slur for people based off joints clanking around, I want in on being called that. I might just start telling people I re-enabled Gemini on my phone and respond to everyone who calls someone that with AI generated shit memes to make sure.

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Whatcha think about tin skin?

This seems like a very specific thing to have made a law about already, what happened?