this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
860 points (98.9% liked)

History Memes

3323 readers
684 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Human history is nuts because humans were around for so long before we ever figured out how to write things down. We had agriculture before language!

[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

And you know tons of people tried to create languages, but they were just surrounded by mother fuckers who were like "look at this bitch, over here with his stick poking the ground. Hey, stick boy! Stop fucking around! Your pictures aren't important! Grug's already the best painting! You see his mammoth? Fucking stick boy."

[–] Brutticus@midwest.social 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I think its interesting that we are also very biased towards long lasting societies, because they leave more stuff for us to study, and literate ones, because they can tell us with their own words what events there were. We still dont have a complete picture of the battle of Cannae, one of the consequential in all of history, whose effects we are still living with. Writing was only invented 4500ish years ago, and humans are as a species are way way older.

Its fucked up to think about Catal Hayuk, or Utsie.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's also interesting how short these time frames actually are. 2000 years are just 80 generations.

All but the most important bullet points of history from that time is wiped out.

And our intuitive understanding "how the past was" is just from maybe 4-5 generations ago.

The past is a vast place and we only ever scratch the very surface of it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No one even really knows what their great grandparents were like, unless they were famous or something. I have no idea who my great, great grandfather even was. It stops in 1872

[–] Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Aren't great grandparents the parents of your grandparents? I knew them, and a lot of people did know theirs. Mine were nice people.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

What about your great, great grandparents then? Do you know what they were like?

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

True, depends on the age when everyone got kids. But the point of the person you replied to still stands: You know the people you met, you might know one or the other story of the people they met, but then it stops.

One of my great grandparents is still alive. They told me a handful of stories from their parents and grandparents. That's it. There's no history beyond a few birth and marriage certificates from beyond that.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And now there is an overwhelming amount of information, as long as someone keeps rotating in fresh hard drives and replacing the dead ones

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Kinda, ish, not really though.

In theory, all that data exists, but huge amounts of it are lost already. There was an indoor pool/waterpark thing that we often went to as kids and it was shut down about 25 years ago.

I tried finding pictures of that, and the only picture I could find was from when it was torn down. There are no (publically available) fotos of that thing being in operation, and 25 years is not a long time.

My wife's grandpa died a while ago and I helped going through his PC to sort what to keep. It was a huge mess and we ended up grabbing a few things that looked relevant, put them onto a hard drive and that on a shelf in my wife's parents' house. And it will likely remain there without anyone looking into it until my wife's parents die, and then it will get tossed out too.

We had long-term shelf-stable data storage for centuries, and still when someone dies we usually throw out their old diaries and photo albums, maybe keeping a handful of pictures. And even if there's a horder in the family who keeps all that, most people end up with dozens or hundreds of descendants over a few generations and one of these descendants ends up with the data. To all others this data is all but lost.

But it's not only that: the number of ancestors you have grows exponentially with each generation you go back. It's easy to keep 4 grandparents straight in mind. 8 great grand parents are also not that hard. 16 great great grandparents that you have likely never met become more difficult. 32 great great grandparents are a lot, and it only gets worse from here. There's only so much mental capacity a human has, so remembering more than just names and dates for everyone a few generations back is all but impossible.

So what we will see in the future is just that there will be more data rotting away until it's thrown out. Cloud services are already starting to go back on their "we store stuff until eternity"-policies.

Confirm what, exactly?

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

And time, goes by so slowly. And time can do so much.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago

The people and/or sentient crabs that study us in thousands of years are going to have WAY crazier things to think about than how ancient the pyramids were to us.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 165 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Ennigaldi-Nanna lived in the mid 6th c. BCE, she was the daughter of Nabonidus, last king of the Neo-Babylonian empire just before Cyrus steamrolled through the whole place. She was the high priestess of Ur - and the first museum curator in History. Her dad, like many other kings between Sumer and Babylon, went around rebuilding temples that were up to 1500 years old in his time, but he picked up more stuff to bring back home.

Ennigaldi-Nanna built herself a special room with shelves where she lined up objects that were dated between 1400 and 2000 BCE, having them cleaned and restored, and she placed clay tablets next to them to explain what they were, where they came from, who made them. In three languages. In a room open to the public.

It's believed that she was present on sites when those objects were picked up. Some of those were from Ur, the city of her temple - her position as high priestess in that temple had been abandonned for a few hundred years before her temple was restored (because her dad was a big fan of the Moon god Nanna and this was his main temple for over a thousand years), so she may have just needed to look around and pick a shovel and a good brush. Nabonidus is also considered "the first serious archaeologist", antiquarian and antique restorer.

Some of the artifacts from Sumer and Babylon that are most famous today, oldest and best preserved, come from that museum. We found a 2500 year old museum, and we put it in a museum.

[–] Capybara_mdp@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thats amazing! Do you have any sources or papers on this temple? (I would love to share with my teacher friends!)

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Wikipedia is a good start

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennigaldi-Nanna%27s_museum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennigaldi-Nanna

Then the history of Ur in general is relevant. For instance, an item listed as part of the museum is a statue of Shulgi, who was king of Ur around 2100 BCE and rebuilt the very same temple to Nanna. One of his statues (statuette) served as foundation nail for the rebuilding of the temple - Sumerians rebuilding temples involved digging down to the foundation to find the original foundation marker, and starting over leaving a new foundation marker by the new king, and we know Shulgi used a statuette of himself for several temples he rebuilt (they all look the same but we found several across different temples). I don't know what specific Shulgi statue Ennigaldi had, but she might have had, for example, a foundation nail recovered when Nabonidus rebuilt the same temple in the same way.

I don't know off the top of my head where to find a list longer than 3 entries for the items she had, unfortunately, I only find non-specific mentions of tablets, jewelry, carved statues, mace heads, kudurrus. Wikipedia only has a vague few items and says they're in a museum in Iraq, but Ur was one of the major cities and we have a lot of things from there in good condition. Including statues of Shulgi, and of course tablets and jewelry. Obviously the biggest problem is that a bunch of items landed in private collections for a while after Leonard Woolley dug up the museum, and the tablets that Ennigaldi wrote for them were separated from the items themselves, so we know from the display explanations what sort of items she had, but it's a lot harder to trace the exact items themselves - but we do have them between private collections and museums.

I don't know any paper that specifically talks about the museum, beyond Woolley's original notes. A few books talk about it, but that's usually less academic (Wikipedia has some links). This article looks like a good write-up.

In 1925, the Woolleys knew they were excavating a Sumerian site that existed in 500 BCE but Ennigaldi’s museum of much older artifacts filled in major historical gaps about an era that had no previous record.

It's from back when they didn't know how old Sumer really was (the first major Mesopotamian cities were found when people in the late 19th c. were trying to prove that the Bible was real and was the beginning of time, instead they found Sumer and doubled the length of known civilized History), so imagine finding a museum that existed in a period you thought was the beginning of history, and that museum held pieces that were nearly as ancient to them as the museum was to you... In 3000 years, people believing Trump was the beginning of civilization will dig up the Penn Museum and the Louvre and oh boy.

Another good link

[–] Capybara_mdp@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago

Thank you!!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago

Not an Egyptologist, but I was actually just talking with a friend (when discussing the loss of information in societies) about ~1500 BCE Pharaohs having to run archeological expeditions to figure out whose tomb was whose to pay the proper respects.

[–] TaeKwonDoh@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (6 children)

And then we have the Epic of Gilgamesh, a 6,000 year old story that reminisces about times long past.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I remember a Hardcore History episode where he talks about how in the time of the Assyrian empire, it was known even then that the world was ancient, filled with individual civilisations that saw themselves as the centre of the world and would marvel at the ignorance of being lumped in together with equally self-possessed civilisations by the historians who write of them only in passing with incomplete sources.

I might have a bit of that wrong, I just woke up and it's been almost a decade since I listened to it. But the part that stuck with me was the idea that even to people we see as deeply ancient, they too had an apprehension that human history is no spring chicken.

And yet, compared with the span of time claimed by the ages of the dinosaurs, humanity has barely existed long enough to clear its throat and introduce itself. And in that time we have been imperiled very often.

I was intrigued to hear that the Toba catastrophe hypothesis may be discredited. I enjoy the idea that 200,000 years ago we may have had as few as 10,000 individuals. It must have been a peaceful time...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 week ago (11 children)

The oldest recorded song in history starts with "in those ancient times". Tale of Gilgamesh IIRC

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've read that their governance was geared towards stability, not growth or disruption. It helps with keeping things going for a long time.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I've read that their governance was geared towards stability, not growth or disruption. It helps with keeping things going for a long time.

I'm confused. How could their leaders earn a big enough quarterly bonus to blow on cocaine?

Edit: This might be something modern government models could adapt and use, to everyone's benefit... If we can just crack the cocaine challenges with it.

I think I'm joking, except I can't stop thinking about how a universal basic cocaine subsidy might actually be what is needed to convince a bunch of problematic leaders to retire...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 37 points 1 week ago

Also crazy is that the thing that brought down the Old Kingdom around 2180 BCE, after nearly a millennia in power, was a megadrought thanks to a climatic change. It took them about 140 years to reboot things into the Middle Kingdom.

load more comments
view more: next ›