this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
675 points (96.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

34129 readers
3773 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It should be <500 or what they said. What they said is mathematically better but grammatically wonky, whereas what you said is 500 is less than steps per day.

Big number > small number < big number

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 5 days ago

I wasn't interpreting the text as being part of the equation so I got a different result

[–] cmeu@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I've been training for this my whole life

[–] BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I think the steps are the only challenge. Just going to the bathroom accrudes 1000 steps sometimes

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

I did that one day. Does it count?

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Sounds miserable no thanks.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 139 points 1 week ago (6 children)

People don't know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols

[–] na_th_an@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If you read it aloud it doesn't sound right, but from a mathematical perspective it's saying the number of steps per day should be less than 500, which I think is the intention of the writer, no?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

500 greater then steps per day

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

500 > steps_per_day

Unfortunately I don't think we have enough information to solve for steps_per_day , though I assume it is also >= 0 .

So we can make an educated guess that

500 > steps_per_day >= 0

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That’s if you interpret the text as being part of the equation

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes that's the intention but they got the order wrong, it would make more sense if it was written as ateps/day < 500

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

It's so wrong it underflowed into somehow being right again.

Unusual? Sure. Mathematically? Right.

People don't know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols

[–] xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s correctly used in the text.

Number of steps < 500 is equivalent to 500 > number of steps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a bit weird, but imo not wrong. 500 > steps/day or steps/day < 500 is the same. As long as the big end of the < or > is at the 500 it makes sense. It only doesn't make sense if you literally read 500 > steps/day as "five hundred greater than steps a day" instead of parsing it as math.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Challenge? Bro this is just life

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

I do believe that is the joke.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

500 greater than steps per day

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah so I did the math. 500 is supposed greater than your number of steps per day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More than, 500 steps a day!? What do you think I am--active?

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

While it did use the greater-than symbol, it was arranged unconventionally. The way it's written is "500 is greater than steps per day," meaning don't walk too much, which fits with the rest of the author's theme.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Was with you until no home cooked meals. Takeaways cost more than I spend on food for a week and I can make better food.

Make it buy a kg of every flavour of sausage at the butchers and eat them all over the month and the challenge works out a lot cheaper and tastier.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah but you'll also be eating sausage for every meal of every day for that entire month.

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It's gonna fit right in with the alcohol

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

This makes me think of a really neat business idea... DoorCook! Where your neighbor is your personal cook! You put in an order and a price range and any "neighbors" within the area can bid on the price.

We synergize our business by avoiding all those pesky regulations like food licenses and let your meal come directly from your loving neighbor.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 22 points 1 week ago

That's what makes it a challenge

[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Takeout every day? Your monthly food bills gotta be over 1k

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One Chipotle bowl could be two of my meals, just to be fair. That's $12 there. Add a cheeseburger or nuggets on a cheap menu and we are talking about $20 per day. 20 * 30 = $600, so still a lot.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nounka@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Already 5.5/7. Woohoo And i am female... Doos that makes me male?

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

'Fraid so. Check your mailbox for the hardhat and a return label for the seatbelt cutter.

[–] ViaGetty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Funny, but I had a seatbelt cutter long before I realized I was a woman.

Wait a minute...

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Seatbelt cutters kind of have a sixth sense about who they're supposed to be with and will seek out those in need.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ghostlychonk@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think I can go back to my 20s.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kamikazerusher@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sedentary September sounds better

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Finally a realistic challenge.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just August? If I was organized enough to have a daily planner this is pretty much every page.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But my home cooked meals slap!

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I despise cooking but now do it almost exclusively because I can fart together a better meal than the cold, mushy, expensive, incorrect much of the time takeout.

I gotta decline the challenge over this point. Everything else seems reasonable.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmm...

  • Daily porn actually gets boring. Porn will start to become "normal" and so you'll get desensitised. Why would I want to desensitise myself from porn?
  • No thank you. I like the occasional cocktail, but alcohol every day!? Ew no.
  • I already do this. :)
  • I get 8 hours sleep minimum. Can't get less. I'll die.
  • My job involves biking... That's technically not taking steps.
  • I already don't do this.
  • That's too bloody expensive! You think I have a tree that grows money!?
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›