this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
300 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

74519 readers
3824 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed https://archive.is/kBbnO

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 150 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Hey so just to be clear: a 200k comp package nowadays is the equivalent of about 81k in 1990.

Put another way: I am doing a good bit worse than my dad was at my age, despite being a pretty solid and experienced software engineer, with an EECS degree, and a lot of devops and system design experience.

This is the collapse of the American social contract. Even people like me who are ostensibly in “great” jobs are treated like code monkeys, and adjusted for inflation, it’s flat or worse than 30-35 years ago. We are doing worse than the generation before us. The American Dream is a nightmare.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Were people getting paid $81k in 1990? This site shows that 95th percentile in 1990 was $58k, and doesn't have more granular data than that above the 95th percentile. So someone making $81k was definitely a 5 percenter, maybe even a 2 percenter.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That site is talking about averages, assembly across the board. The person you’re talking to is explicitly talking about CS jobs, like software developer or system engineer.

You can’t really compare the two.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No, but it is a starting point for passing some kind of sanity check. Someone who was making $81k in 1990 was making an exceedingly high salary in the general population, and computer-related professions weren't exactly known for high salaries until maybe the 2000's.

[This report] (https://www.bls.gov/ocs/publications/pdf/white-collar-pay-private-goods-producing-industries-march-1990.pdf) has government statistics showing that in March 1990, entry level programmers were making on average about $27k. Senior programmers were making about $34k. Systems analysts (which I understand to have primarily been mainframe programmers in 1990) were making low 30s at the entry level and high 60s at the most senior level. Going up the management track, only the fourth and highest level was making above $80k, and it seems to me that those are going to be high level executives.

So yeah, $81k is a very senior level in the 1990s tech industry, probably significantly less common than today's $200k tech jobs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think it's the same in all developed nations; constantly needing more skills to achieve the same standard of living. I think a lot of it is from nearly all resources getting more expensive to extract (oil, wood, iron, etc) due to us having already extracted all the low-hanging-fruit, and needing to move on to more resource-intensive methods like offshore-drilling, fracking, importing lumber long distances from harsher climates. The other drivers are the attacks on labor and executives/shareholders taking more profits for themselves instead of paying their workers more.

[–] MBech 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Your last point is where I'm putting most of the blame. We're all doing worse because a few people at the top always, ALWAYS have to do better than last year.

Eternal growth is physically impossible. At some point, shit will have to stagnate, and if shit starts to stagnate, but the top still insists on eternal growth, they'll have to take some from the bottom. That's what's happening right now. The top can no longer keep making more money off of an industry in development, so instead they'll cut costs, costs being you, the worker, and hope they die before it all collapses under them.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

But the filthy wealthy gotta grow their wealth somehow!

I lived in Denmark for a few years, and no, it isn't the same in all developed nations.

[–] MagicianWithABadPlan@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There never was a social contract, there never was anyone bound to look after your interest. That is why unions are the answer.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Unions are part of the social contract, its very simple. Those that have aren't too harsh on those who have less, or we drag them into the street and tear them limb from limb like wild animals. We're simply working through the various stages between complaints and dismemberment.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 45 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Wait what? Who is making $165k out of college?

I don't even make $165k after working for... I don't know let's say 12 or 15 I can't keep track what counts anymore

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 8 points 6 days ago

Some big tech companies pay that, theoretically, in total compensation for entry level. These companies make about $1 million per employee.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

My first tech job out of college was $55k.

Average in my area for new grads at best is like $85k.

My highest paying was $195k as a Senior and my average is probably $150k as a Senior / Lead.

None of this was big tech though.

Yeah, I'm more-or-less the same. Outside of Silicon Valley, Seattle, and a few other big metros, tech pay is good, but not amazing. I know what I'd have to do to get $200k+, but I'm unwilling to (crazy hours, move to SF, etc).

Yeah I made $51k out of college.

My first software job I made $68k? Granted Im at $150k after all that time, but still. Dang yo you know?

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Who is making $165k out of college?

Computer science and engineering grads at the top of their class at top schools who choose not to go to grad school. This thread claims to cite Department of Education data to show median salaries 3 years after graduation, and some of them are higher than $165k. Sure, that's 3 years out, but it's also median, so one would expect 75th or 90th percentile number to be higher.

Anecdotally, I know people from Stanford/MIT who did get their first jobs in the Bay Area for more than $150k more than 10 years ago, so it was definitely possible.

But this NYT article has stories about graduates from Purdue, Oregon State, and Georgetown which are good schools but also generally weren't the schools producing many graduates landing in those $150k jobs as that very top tier. I would assume the kids graduating from Cal Tech, MIT, Stanford, and UC Berkeley are still doing well. But the middle is getting left behind.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago

I don't make quite that after 8 years of doing this stuff. That being said, I dropped out of college twice. Maybe $100k of debt is what I need to close that $25k difference lol

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I technically did... But I had prior experience to my college degrees. Also blew through 6 years of degree in 3.5. Turns out college is piss easy if you already have the real world experience.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How did you do that? Did you take more than 5 courses per semester or did you challenge a bunch of exams?

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

18-24 credit hour semesters... and summer courses when available.

Since I knew virtually most of the program going in, course load in general was stupidly easy to manage. But I would not recommend it unless you really know the material/subject matter.

Edit: there was heavy incentive... GI bill pays for 4 years of schooling. I have a few months left of that 4 year period left of my GI bill... But if I didn't take everything accelerated, I couldn't get the masters. So I just went full ham on the curriculum.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My brother in law got fucked by this. Smart kid and beloved by his boss, company folded and now works at a fucking dominos.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

So, life of a humanities major like my wife. Actually, most majors that weren't STEM.

If it helps anyone in this situation, you can try to bank on other skills. My wife is doing great now but got her start because of her bilingualism, and even that was only 35k a year. My sister did a little better with her music degree by pivoting to community manager, although in her case she had experience modding for a well known streamer. That was pretty good money right out the gate.

Point is, programming isn't your everything, even if you're leveraging something from your personal life.

I remember this same article decades ago during the late 90's and early 2000's.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

Those offers for new grads were always insane and never going to last. That was entirely a sign of the zero interest rate bubble during covid.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

How about $165k guillotine operators?

load more comments
view more: next ›