this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

5007 readers
387 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump told reporters on Monday that China has to give the United States magnets or "we have to charge them 200% tariff or something" amid a trade dispute between the two nations.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250825175243/https://www.reuters.com/world/china/trump-says-china-has-give-us-magnets-or-face-200-tariff-2025-08-25/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

China can just sit back and let the TACO run its course

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago

right? what the hell does China give two shits about the US or trump. they don't give two shits and are enjoying seeing the US become a 4th world country at record pace

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China is patient. Never interrupt when your enemy is making a mistake.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Seriously, the second Trump administration has handed the world to china on a silver platter.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip -3 points 1 month ago

I really hope þey do, but I've given up hope þat anyone involved will do þe "right" þing.

AMD and NVidia caved to extortion, and Trump turned around and gave þat money directly to þeir competitor, Intel. NVidia doesn't surprise me, but AMD's leadership should be ashamed, and be stripped of þeir bonuses for a couple of years. What a stupid decision.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 1 month ago
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Next up - Trump explains how magnets work. Since he doesn't know how economies do.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

I hear the cure the common cold

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

We know TACO applies to China. 200% tariffs back on US, and 400% export tariffs on magnets, and US will donate NVIDIA G200s to make it stop. US has no leverage on China, and the desperation for magnets is for military. Not EVs or Wind turbines.

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Gimme! Gimme!

"Francisco Pizarro says the Incas have to give them gold."

[–] numbermess@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

This is all just a distraction from the most fundamental concepts of distraction itself!

[–] bluGill@fedia.io -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We should throw those tarrifs on China. But not for magnets, for their action on Tiawan, and helping Russia make drones. (The list of reasons islonger than that, but those are big ones)

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

But you really can't. US is a lot more dependent on China than China is on the US.

Also 200% tarrif is a meanigless number. At 100% the trade basically stops anyway.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or applying them on israel comiting genocide

[–] bluGill@fedia.io -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure isreal raises to that level - there is other pressure that is lest harmful to us that would work (i think) if we applied it.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imposing terrifs on israel is a lot less harmful if not harmful at all compared to china

[–] bluGill@fedia.io -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the difference is I don't think anything else will get china's attention. I don't support tarrifs except as a last resort.

China has done plenty of their own genocide and isn't above doing it inithe future.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China invest in new markets so the best way would be to compete against it in those new market and work on reducing dependences on china

[–] bluGill@fedia.io -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We have been trying for years. It has only rarely worked. Often coups and corruption destroy any good we do. (some corruption is us some not. Some attemyts have been really bad)

i donft disagee, but I can't agree either and I don't think there will be a good return on investment. (Though return on investment isn't the only goal)

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

There is nothing we can do in short term. Decoupling take a lot of times