this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
990 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

16529 readers
1730 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seraphine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 6 days ago (6 children)

americans be using anything but the metric system

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 6 days ago

But they're the sort of British that yearns for the good old days, when we still had shillings and inches and diphtheria and jumpers for goalposts and no womens' rights and all that great British stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

obviously the scientists meant a spherical giraffe in a vacuum

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 13 points 6 days ago

Reads Daily Mail clickbait, proceeds to blame "scientists"

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So like the size of a horse?

The average horse is about half the height and weight of the average giraffe. Giraffes are just a really bad unit of measurement, males weight about 400kg more than females and there is a wide height difference over their global population, they are technically four different species we just all call giraffe 🦒

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I was just going to say, what kind of weird ass size comparison is that. It’s almost as egregious as saying “half the size of two apples”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] territorial@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 days ago

In other words, a large boulder the size of a small boulder

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

One standard volume giraffe of course, i.e. the volume in m³ an average giraffe would fill (at room temperature and sea level), when passed through a blender. And then half of that

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The scientists had to go through many more proportionate animals before discovering that half a giraffe was a near perfect match for the size of the asteroid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Also, most people dont even have a good grasp on how big giraffes are anyways!

I once went to a zoo that had an elevated platform extending into the giraffe's habitat so that you could stand face to face with them. Their heads are as big as a normal human, like 5 feet from crown to chin!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

And is it half the volume, mass or a dimension? Because I've never tried neither blending or carrying a giraffe before (I never got invited to those parties in uni) so I have no grasp on volume or mass.

[–] BillBurBaggins@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Surely a giraffe is nearly uniform density making the distinction between volume and mass irrelevant

Assume a spherical giraffe.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I love it when I can understand your memes!

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ask questions when you do not. :)

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh I wouldn’t begin to know what to even ask. I’m a music major lol. But if I think of something, I’ll pipe up.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Start with where you are, others will be there too. :)

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

Thanks! I’ll do that.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago

The Daily Mail readership will not fathom your question. It is a rag for those who would follow MAGA but want to appear intelligent without have either the natural talent or putting in any work to increase knowledge. Baseline racism is a requirement

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 6 points 6 days ago

I once saw a snake half the size of a garden hose.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (8 children)

I don't get why Americans are doing their best to avoid the metric system. It's always weird discriptions. Like dishwashers, or in this case, half a giraffe. Just use bananas if (cubic) meters are too complex.

[–] morkyporky@suppo.fi 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn't daily mail in the UK?

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You mean wannabe US? (never truly accepted metric system, even discussed to change back to imperial)

Edit: fair point though. My bad.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As a USian, even we are baffled by measuring things in hands and stone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)

It's not the scientists, it's a single journalist who is popping out these headlines. Some of those caught attention.

[–] oyfrog@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

The anatomical answer is sagitally down the midline.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Bilaterally as is the way.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

Probably along the primary axis

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The thing that's bothering me is that they ended a question with a period. Why, random person on the Internet, why?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›