Anybody know what the model number of this Walkman was?
Edit: it's the WM-10. I'd not seen one before but it's an attractive device.
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Anybody know what the model number of this Walkman was?
Edit: it's the WM-10. I'd not seen one before but it's an attractive device.
yes, glad u found it cause i couldnt
Looks like the WM-20.
I'm still listening to locally saved mp3 on my phone, fuck streaming. My audio playback application (VLC) even has a powerful equalizer built in, which is huge and would be much more difficult if you used e.g. Spotify instead.
I just thought about this but isn't it kind of a piss off that we went from walkmans, which were both smaller and more reliable than discmans, and we all just accepted that?
My Walkman never skipped. The smaller shape made way more sense. I could record on it. Why the fuck did we even accept discmans.
CDs were just better. Sound quality, you could select a specific song without winding forward or backward, repeat, shuffle, you name it.
The disadvantages of skipping were eventually resolved. If you just wanted to go for a jog then a cassette player was still better.
reason 1: sony likes money
reason 2: music industry likes money
reason 3: cds were far cheaper than cassettes, and promising far more quality (which was true technically but discmans kinda not really great to get those quality benefits so its just marketing gimmick) (audiophiles will argue about this idc)
CDs have much better longevity than cassettes, and if you're already buying pre-burned CDs instead of pre-recorded tapes, you might as well skip the step where you transfer data from CD to tape.
CD skipping was indeed a pretty big issue, though.