this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
201 points (99.0% liked)

UK Politics

4356 readers
96 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I know fuck all about UK politics, but bring em to the US.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They also oppose nuclear power and wind farms if they might impact house prices.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

They seem to be moving away from that

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, the Greens just got my vote.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

lol downvote from the chode who's mum's a landlord

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I downvoted because rent control is an idiotic idea that just reduces housing construction.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

of course you do.

tell your mum I said hi.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago

Yes fucking please.

[–] oeuf@slrpnk.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

This seems like a really sensible combination of policies. Go Greens 👍

I'm (now somewhat half-heartedly I'm sad to say) going to give the Your Party project a chance to redeem itself and if it doesn't seem viable after the conference I'm joining the Greens.

[–] ns1@feddit.uk 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Starting with rent controls and abolishing Right to Buy, a future Green Party-led government would also tax landlords via business rates on Airbnbs and double taxation on empty properties.

Under the proposals, the party would also end Buy to Let mortgages and give councils the Right to Buy when landlords sell properties, when the property doesn’t meet insulation standards, or when a property has been vacant for more than six months.

Carla Denyer, Green MP for Bristol Central, sought to stress that despite the motions "eye-catching" title, "it does not actually 'abolish' landlords".

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The taxing empty property 2x is smart.

Clearly someone recognised that as soon as they gain power. A lot of land lords would start refusing to rent. In the hope of creating a housing shortage and forcing the gov to reset.

The taxation forces them to either rent or sell. And sell at a reasonable price given changes in the market.

It prevents wealthy property owners trying to hold the gov hostage.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I had a better idea. What about every additional house you own drives up the tax rate on every house you own by 1-2 %? This makes it affordable to still own a vacation house if you really want one, but by the 3-4th house, there's zero profit margin on the houses (if you're renting them out and it quickly becomes pointless or expensive to own multiple properties.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This just creates a market for fake tenants.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i would assume fraud would be illegal

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As long as the government doesn't catch wind, I don't think landlords would give a damn.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

if they are going to commit fraud anyway, then you might as well as pass the law

cc uplifting news

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I applied to view a house the other day and the landlord started to interview me before giving a viewing and has now stopped replying.

IN SO GLAD FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO PAY SOMEBODY ELSE'S MORTGAGE

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing's worse than a long-running seller's market where the government is too weak to intervene.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If there are no more landlords then there is no more private renting? Where will people be able to live while they build up a deposit?

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Public renting, not for profit

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Great. Who is renting out all these houses?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Never heard of council houses? I know Thatcher sold off most of them but a few still exist. Right to buy is terrible.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

Yep. Currently very oversubscribed so you'll need to build more. How much are the greens planning to invest in the council house estate while they roll back private landlords?

[–] Schal330@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It would typically be the local council of that particular area.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ask them, I’m not in the UK.

I would assume a non-partisan government entity of some sort. The same way public utilities or public health care is handled.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Welllll

Carla Denyer, Green MP for Bristol Central, sought to stress that despite the motions "eye-catching" title, "it does not actually 'abolish' landlords".

For starters.

This is to make investment properties and landbanking less attractive. There will still be landlords. But slumlords and opportunists will be less attracted.

And it's also allowing:

[...] give councils the Right to Buy when landlords sell properties, when the property doesn’t meet insulation standards, or when a property has been vacant for more than six months.

So that also partially answers your question about council housing numbers.

All there in the article

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Having lived in a badly insulated rental I've often thought there should be some sort of incentive to encourage landlords to improve the energy efficiency of their properties. How to frame a tax that didn't immediately get passed onto the tenants?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

In Vic we have "minimum standards" as part of our reforms. Property has to meet them. It's still gradually improving, the big issue is our tenants tribunal is backlogged and needs a fuckton more resources

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -5 points 3 weeks ago

Just in time for Corbyn to split the left vote because he can't bear the thought of anybody else being in charge.