this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7511 readers
829 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 54 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

The irony, I swear

Edit: To add, we've had a similar situation with the romanian diaspora in europe voting mostly for the anti-eu candidate during the presidentials. The mind boggles.

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 41 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Those leopards surely won't eat my face.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Vote Face-Eating Leopards' Party! We promise not to eat your face!

Could these eyes lie? Leopard eating something (probably a face)

[–] brainwashed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

3 generations down they will.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

Yup. The Romanian diaspora is simultaneously being treated like undesirable immigrants, and wants immigrants in Romania to be thrown out to protect the "purity" of the country. A country they no longer live in, and have no intention of returning to.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Every time I hear something about AfD or one of the other far-right morons I play a game in my head: where did they steal this one from? Which part of MAGA is reflected here? In this case: the Latin Vote. They see how the apparent contradiction can simply be ignored and the same rhetoric applied.

BTW, my mom is an immigrant in Germany herself (not Turkish though) and happily repeating all of AfD's anti-immigration talking points.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Love my mom. After happily living in Germany for 50 years or so she is now applying for citizenship so that she can vote against those fuckers.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 5 days ago

This gives me hope.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Why can't the fucking media stop calling the SPD "center-left"? There is nothing left left in the SPD, they are really just another neoliberal centrist party with right leaning tendencies, always ready to copy any half way successful right winger's rhetoric and ideas.

That the SPD lost support of the lower classes is no surprise and a direct result of everything the SPD has done in the past 3 decades.

Of course, it's monumentally stupid of the lower classes to flock to fascists instead, especially for people with immigrant background, but the AfD's Propaganda is especially aimed at lower income demographics, and thanks to a whole bunch of parrots in the media and copycats in the "democratic" parties, they are gaining popularity instead of losing it.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Left, right and center depend on the country. In the German context the SPD is center left. Not because they would have been so in the past. The party certainly moved to the right, but because they support more left leaning policies then the CDU.

[–] DonPiano@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

Eh. I'd say it's center right, the c*u is right, there's the fascists/far right and then you have the social democratic parties left of center like the greens and the linke.

Things don't have to be relative in this context either. They're also relative, but you can use more absolute criteria as well. Stuff like "wants no one to be coerced into employment" vs "wants some people coerced mildly" vs "wants to coerce everyone to be employed". Or the converse with regards to social security. Or criteria relating to individual rights. Or regulation in favor of hierarchical power structures vs regulations in favor of non-hierarchical power structures. These would all be meaningful left-right aligned analytical lenses.

I do agree though that relative statements can for certain contexts be more immediately practical. But also, the case of the spd is one where thinking about the space of possible party landscapes is relevant: What if the spd were center-left, in the sense of reformist left-wing/labor movement/syndicalist-ish policies, instead of a seeheimer circle oriented mildly right-wing party? That would present a very different type of discourse in society, i feel.

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The SPD was always like that. There is a quote by Tucholsky saying that about the SPD in 1932.

Translation by deepl, original below

"It is unfortunate that the SPD is called the Social Democratic Party of Germany. If, since August 1, 1914, it had been called the Reformist Party or the Party of the Lesser Evil or Here Families Can Make Coffee or something like that, the new name would have opened the eyes of many workers, and they would have gone where they belong: to a workers' party. But as it is, the shop does its bad business under a formerly good name."

"Es ist ein Unglück, daß die SPD Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands heißt. Hieße sie seit dem 1. August 1914 Reformistische Partei oder Partei des kleinern Übels oder Hier können Familien Kaffee kochen oder so etwas –: vielen Arbeitern hätte der neue Name die Augen geöffnet, und sie wären dahingegangen, wohin sie gehören: zu einer Arbeiterpartei. So aber macht der Laden seine schlechten Geschäfte unter einem ehemals guten Namen."

[–] fnix@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago

It’s not wrong, but was there also a good alternative party at the time? AFAIK, the communists were happy to see Weimar burn, hoping it’s them and not the Nazis who would rise from the ashes.

You're right, but the SPD also had a brief interlude where they actually did advocate and advance workers' rights from the end of WW2 until the early 1980s.

[–] xsr13@feddit.org 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] verdi@feddit.org -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Newer migration competes with established communities for low skill labour, puts pressure on unskilled labour wages, increases conpetition for affordable housing and tipically increases criminality in neighbourhoods typically inhabited by low income families. Maybe, instead of the entire thread dunking on the Turks like fucking racists that you are, people can stop for a minute and ask why are these communities reacting like this. Migration is a serious issue and has toppled many a leader when brought to the fore as a political talking point. Maybe drop the dogmas and look at the data! It's always the poorer that feel the pressure just so privileged Hans can afford a housekeeper and a gardner with his Beamte wage!

[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

I have to say. The way some outlets and people concentrate on second, third and fourth generation immigrants that vote the NSDAP 2.0, seems to me like the middle class germans are looking for a way to blame someone else but themself. The main voting bloc for the fascist is like everywhere else the middle class because they dont want to share with people they view as below them.