this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
208 points (93.3% liked)

Today I Learned

25364 readers
409 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Abstract: Participants (N = 717) characterized their relationships with their dog and four human partners: closest kin, romantic partner, best friend, and child, using the Network of Relationships Inventory. The results showed that owners reported greater satisfaction with their dogs than with any human partner except their child. They received more Support from dogs than from any human partner except their child and experienced fewer Negative Interactions with their dogs compared to any human partner, except their best friend. Overall, the relationship with the dog provided high Companionship, opportunities for Nurturance, and minimal Negative Interactions. This may stem from the fact that the dog-human relationship features a more asymmetric power dynamic than human relationships – i.e., owners have full control over the dog’s life

Turcsán, B., Ujfalussy, D.J., Kerepesi, A. et al. Similarities and differences between dog–human and human–human relationships. Sci Rep 15, 11871 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95515-8

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Man, dog people have some really shitty relationships.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I get it though, unconditional love is something else. They will always love you while never asking questions and when they do something wrong (like rolling in shit), you can say they don't understand (they totally do)

[–] admin@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

They will always love you while never asking questions

Because they are incapable of, I get the sentiment that dogs relationship for some people mean, but you can't project the part of sentiment they are incapable of, on them, and be happy about it.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, dogs can definitely hate you. If they know you're a shit person, that opinion is formed and they won't like you. You got to be really careful with dogs, something as little as a friendly prank or tease can really hurt their feelings and they'll go out of their way to not be around you.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Absolutely. This isn't anthropomophisation either. Some dogs can be vindictive, jealous, mercenary etc. Sometimes they just don't like someone. Could be smell, could be anything.
My old dog hated dreadlocks. Can dogs be racist? Probably.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's all that matters when you need some support

[–] admin@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Incapable of loving? I guess it depends how idealized is your personal concept of "love".

[–] admin@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

no not love,I was talking about the questioning part in this case.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Hmm I don't know, it really depends what is the meaning of "asking questions".

[–] polle@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This, or people are bad at Symmetric relationships and need tho be the center of attention. This article does not provide this information

[–] prex@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you really think this is why people get dogs?
My dog & I both know who the centre of attention is & he won't let me forget it.

[–] polle@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

No. I just said that the article does not say why.

[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I say this all the time. My cat is my best friend. I also have other friends but still it's not even close. My cat wakes me up every morning at the same time, knows my entire routine, greets me at the door when I come home and curls up with me in bed. In turn I also know her routine and I make an effort to understand and provide what she needs in terms of food, games and environmental enrichment. It's more symbiotic than any human relationship I've ever had.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hell yeah, genuinely the same over here, will straight up murder for my boy.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Shit he murders for funsies

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

What a puppy cat. My last cat was like that.

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Love 'em (got 2), but they're just not quite as attached to their humans as dogs tend to be.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 1 week ago (13 children)

You can have some of ours. They won't leave us alone!

load more comments (13 replies)

Cats? My cat blamed me for when she got hiccups and thought I was trying to kill her.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The strength of that relationship can vary, though, like this evening when our dog found poop in the yard and started rolling in it. Bathing the dog isn’t how we had planned to spend our Friday night!

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dearly love my kid, but I don't think I would rely on them for support. Certainly they would be willing to at least try to provide it, but they're a kid. Any significant support being provided should go in the opposite direction.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Point is parents don't judge their children ( not as much) and dogs don't judge us. We love children unconditionally (to some extent) and dogs love us unconditionally.

Our children, they love us unconditionally only until they to grow to certain age.

That's will most people prefer dogs generally. They are exceptions. But generally it holds true.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This shit wreaks of AI slop.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, that's what I get for not being AI smart..

Fuck I had to correct so many AI typos for this comment.

Mommy I want a real keyboard for Christmas!

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Clocks*

Thought now would be a good time to pile on

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Skimming through the actual article I’m assuming it’s an AI generated summary of one section, although I’m not quickly finding even what it’s pulling from

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's clearly CoPilot, asking ChatGPT, to pull information from Grok's ass.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~Not AI. It is me. The abstract is posted on the primary source Nature. Here is the citation~~ Post updated to included citation. Sry. Not AI. Just human error Turcsán, B., Ujfalussy, D.J., Kerepesi, A. et al. Similarities and differences between dog–human and human–human relationships. Sci Rep 15, 11871 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95515-8

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Dogs are certainly not naturally occurring. You could say they are an artificial construct by humans. And sure, they're intelligent enough.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Read over the paragraph again.

Look at how many times it ignorantly uses a Capital Letter in the middle of a sentence...

Shit like that is obviously AI generated...

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sorry. I should have included citation. ~~What AI? It is an actual study posted on Nature. I read the study on the primary source. It is the abstract. PsyPost reposts and summarises it. I should have posted the citation. Sorry~~ Here is the citation.

Turcsán, B., Ujfalussy, D.J., Kerepesi, A. et al. Similarities and differences between dog–human and human–human relationships. Sci Rep 15, 11871 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95515-8

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago

Someone should tell our dogs.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That punctuation. "Including romantic partners, except children." WTF?

I am much closer to my husband and kids than to the dogs and cats but feel more responsibility towards the pets, the kids I am growing into adults who take care of themselves, the dogs and cats we care for until they die.

load more comments
view more: next ›