this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
186 points (97.9% liked)

196

4614 readers
1321 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

nah not a villain because he actually finds out what's wrong with the patients and fixes it. Even if the methods are torture, as someone suffering from chronic illness where I haven't yet found a doctor who gives a shit to actually find out what it is, I'd gladly almost die if it meant I'd start feeling better. Usually I just get pushed out the door ASAP with some pills.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If your experience with the medical system is worse than Dr House, it does not speak well of him

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Play You're Just Imagining It for a "fun" way to see how the medical system treats you when you have a chronic illness.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yay! npckc is one of my favorite Ren'Py game makers!

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read it as: the medical system being worse than house says more about the system than it does about house.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Their statement finishes with, "... it does not speak well of him."

That is specifically calling House worse than reality, so...

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago

If we're doing a detailed breakdown of their statement, that statement says that it doesn't say anything good, not that it says anything bad.
I assumed they were a non-native English speaker who bungled "not good is opposite good, or bad" and instead had "not good is absence of good, or neutral".

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 0 points 20 hours ago

Maybe they thought they said it doesn't speak well of the actual doctor, forgetting the fact that they said "the system" rather than "your doctor" in the preceding part of the comment. I do stuff like that all the time and then when rereading I call myself a dumbass and fix it. Shit happens.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only note: I think he's so ~~borderline~~ criminal in his behavior that he never actually documents the insane expensive tests for billing. He just does them without scheduling or booking the machine or equipment. Note how he often has doctors operating the MRI, and not a radiology technician or someone trained to actually take the pictures on the specific machine.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Are most of these tests actually expensive for the hospital, or is it mostly the hospital overcharging for them?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some tests are legitimately expensive, some are "priced for insurance", and some are a complicated middle ground where you could reasonably argue either way. Like, an MRI isn't a cheap machine, nor is it devoid of ongoing costs, and the facility requirements to operate one are also extensive. The actual cost to run a single MRI scan though is materially cheap, ignoring labor costs. About the cost in electricity to power a house for a day. Less than $10 dollars.
On the one hand, taking those upfront, ongoing maintenance, and facilities costs and spreading them out over the cost of each scan seems reasonable. Without that money they can't actually buy and run the machine. It can add up to $500-$10,000 per scan.
On the other hand, if you don't get the test and the machine is just idle during the time, their costs only go down $10. You could reasonably argue that they should take any offer more than $10 if they have more idle capacity available than is needed for emergency usage.

Some genetic and nuclear testing just intrinsically involves expensive materials. They're not done often and the materials are difficult to get together safely. Given the nature of the show, those are going to be represented more often. It's not nearly as fun to watch the rogue doctor fail to charge $75 for an automated metabolic panel as it is to watch him jam a hamster gall bladder full of neptunium up someone's urethra while spinning them like a rotisserie in an fmri.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the same way you said hospitals "price for insurance", I wouldn't be surprised if medical equipment manufacturers were doing the same, but to hospitals.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

They definitely do, but for different reasons.
Hospitals increase prices they send to insurance so that the reduced rate the insurance pays covers their cost+profit. The insurance company wants to spend as little money as possible from their risk pool, and they want to advertise their "massive negotiation powers" to their big customers who have enough members to self fund (the insurance company just manages the money and billing, so zero risk on their part).
GE and the hospital have a much more traditional business to business relationship. GE is actually providing them with a very delicate piece of machinery that is enormous, filled with liquid helium, that produces a preposterous magnetic field and is safe enough to stick a squishy person into.
Their extra markup comes from the certifications that tell you that you can trust that it's safe for those squishy people. It's an intangible value add, sometimes legally mandated (FDA approval), sometimes an assurance of quality (all those ISO certifications attesting to quantifiable defect rates).
They're not charging you more so when you pay less they still make a profit. They're charging more because there's only a handful of companies that can actually sell the damn things, and they all also have the same intangible costs.

Medical equipment is expensive because the price jump between "works" and "you can trust it with someone's life" is a very expensive one. The paper documenting it even more so.

[–] LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

Most of the tests themselves aren't expensive to run, but the equipment is often really expensive and maintenance, repair and software licenses needed use the equipment add expenses. Trained tech time isn't cheap either, but yeah the costs are still massively inflated in for-profit hospitals.

[–] azureskypirate@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

House was a diagnostician. His job and passion was solving the mystery. Patients have to give consent to recieve treatment.

That said, House avoided scans whenever necessary because they almost always showed benign tumors. He preferred identifing possible diseases through symtomatic analsys (discussing with whiteboard) and using diagnostic trials (trying a treatment) to eliminate remaining possibilities.

I want a series reboot.🤩

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

He definitely isn't a good guy

He's wheel of time Semirhage from the age of legends heals the patients but gets their kicks torturing them before that he just prefers psychological torture to Semirhage's physical torture.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 1 day ago

He needs mouse bites!

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’ve only watched the first 4 seasons or so of House, but in the basically the definition of an anti-hero?

[–] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

OP is onto something