this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
135 points (95.9% liked)

Opensource

4205 readers
955 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mormund@feddit.org 39 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Not to be a hater, but why? (Referring to the two screens, not the open source part)

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Obvious answer is to be more like a normal book

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but again, why? People who care about the physical feel of books just get them from the library. People who want something convenient have e-readers. It feels like a worst of both worlds more than a best

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 days ago

The case with the front cover flap already does that.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Some books are written or laid out with two pages in mind. What this specific e-reader unfortunately doesn't solve is the problem with double page spreads in manga (although digital versions, at least those I use, don't spread them on two pages anyway).

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Also I could see it being useful if you can "pin" some pages on one side, especially if you need to compare multiple documents on the fly.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm a huge fan of this idea. Having a light clamshell device for reading means the formatting would be (should be, might be) closer to that of a physical book. With most books I don't think that matters, but there are tons where the author plays with page formatting & typography and it rarely comes off well in a single-screen ereader.

Additionally - clamshell means built-in screen protection. I've never liked those stick-on 3rd party screen protector sheets, and a clamshell design is going to do a better job of protecting the screen anyway. Something like this you can snap it closed and chuck it in a bag without worrying.

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I just checked the weight: it's 300g which is a little heavier than my Kobo with case (273g) and a ~400 page paperback (213g). That's lighter than I expected given that it's basically two readers stuck together including two batteries.

However, I think the kind of media that would benefit from the original page layout would also need a higher resolution, and perhaps colour.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

However, I think the kind of media that would benefit from the original page layout would also need a higher resolution, and perhaps colour.

Indeed. Resolution will probably need to be higher in that regard. For books (not comics or art books), color should not be that important.

That being said, the issue of (not) owning and (not) controlling our ebooks is the reason why I stopped reading & purchasing them a few years ago (despite being heavy into those since the early 00s). So, I'm very much interested in that project :)

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Books are horrible in the beginning and the end one side is to think and it's awkward to hold.

[–] tatann@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Given your instance (lemmynsfw), I'm gonna assume that it's because you need to hold the book with one hand ;)

/jk I also prefer the one page format of e-books, although I understand that 2 pages can be good for comic books/manga

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 15 hours ago

As the great french philosopher Wayne gretzky says "Takes one to know one". Quick wit edgy humor! holy shit im honored thanks for the laugh.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 days ago

Probably much cheaper and easier to get, while allowing for a reasonably large total screen size.

[–] hash@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I also don't really see the appeal of a two screen format. Currently use a boox palma 2 phone sized reader. I keep my font size pretty large but don't really find needing to turn the page a bit more a burden.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Too bad the front isn't a screen too. It would be pretty awesome to open a book and automatically slave the front screen to the book's cover.

Also strange that the dev didn't enable wifi. That's just strange. It's running an esp32, it has a wifi chip and getting it to connect is incredibly easy.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Probably don't want the burden of keeping the firmware up-to-date with the latest security fixes, and miminizes the risk of a security exploit if that door isn't opened.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We really need FLOSS ebook readers

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Unburdened ebook stores that actually stock "everything" is a necessary component here.

[–] RonSijm@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Pretty cool. I tried to google it, and I couldn't actually find the source for it. Just a bunch of articles about it and a reddit thread.

I'm curious what it's written in

[–] sunstoned@lemmus.org 4 points 2 days ago

from the crowdfunding site

Therefore, the design files (schematics, PCB, case) will be made open-source when the campaign is finished and the design is finalized.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Can verify there's no source open, checked the dev's github linked from the diptyx web page

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Have you seen the resolution? It's crappy.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I haven't. More than anything I'm supporting the idea of something like this. Little clamshell ereader that's not tied to a company? Hell yeah. Version 0.01 here might not be what I'm lusting after, but it's that much closer to Version 2.0.

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I guess I'm too much of a "if you're gonna do something, then do it right the first time" kinda person. I've learned from (too much) experience that compromises on quality too often just wind up being wasted money.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well the problem here is that there isn't a company that have money and so they can't do a very good product, when the project will gain money they can do a V2 with better specs and in general they will know better how build it, this prosuct is pre-launch and in general you have to see those as betas not a end product.

Also, e-ink displays cost more than my balls

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pine64 tried that with their PineNote, which hardware wise seems excellent. But it ended up being so expensive that sales were abmyssal and subsequently there was also little developer take up and general community excitement to make something cool out of it on the software side.

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, that's pretty common. Final cost will always matter, but the product still has to be worth it. Many companies have a history of not making the best balance calls, however.

One thing I've learned never to scrimp too much on, however, is anything i directly interact with. Displays are especially important for the health of your eyes - especially with as much time as most people spend looking at them nowadays. As such, I can't really get behind this product.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

I can dig that. Just like how I have no intention of building / buying this model, but the progress towards something I've been pining for is exciting.

[–] RonSijm@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

If it's "open source hardware" wouldn't it be pretty easy to put it different screens?

Like it also only had a 2 GB SD card.. I'd guess most people would upgrade that