this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
990 points (100.0% liked)

196

17009 readers
543 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image Transcription:

A tweet from the George Takei Twitter account which states:

"A Democrat was in the White House when my family was sent to the internment camps in 1941. It was an egregious violation of our human and civil rights.

It would have been understandable if people like me said they’d never vote for a Democrat again, given what had been done to us.

But being a liberal, being a progressive, means being able to look past my own grievances and concerns and think of the greater good. It means working from within the Democratic party to make it better, even when it has betrayed its values.

I went on to campaign for Adlai Stevenson when I became an adult. I marched for civil rights and had the honor of meeting Dr. Martin Luther King. I fought for redress for my community and have spent my life ensuring that America understood that we could not betray our Constitution in such a way ever again.

Bill Clinton broke my heart when he signed DOMA into law. It was a slap in the face to the LGBTQ community. And I knew that we still had much work to do. But I voted for him again in 1996 despite my misgivings, because the alternative was far worse. And my obligation as a citizen was to help choose the best leader for it, not to check out by not voting out of anger or protest.

There is no leader who will make the decision you want her or him to make 100 percent of the time. Your vote is a tool of hope for a better world. Use it wisely, for it is precious. Use it for others, for they are in need of your support, too."

End Transcription.

The last paragraph I find particularly powerful and something more people really should take into account.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 1 year ago (19 children)

"Democrats have always fucked me over but I keep voting for them because the alternative is actively more harmful".

No, I don't find it touching nor powerful. This is a celebration of the failure of the 2 party system.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 115 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (28 children)

When you roll out the feasible alternative let me know. Until then, I'll be voting for the candidate whose rallies don't break out in chants of "kill f*ggots, kill all transgenders"

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (26 children)

We need to get RCV passed at the state level in at least 33 states, then we can get rid of FPTP at the federal level, and actually force some change

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Silverstrings@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not what he said and you know it, shut up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This would all be resolved if America just changed first past the post voting.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We'll only change it with enough push from citizens

Push for a new system (like ranked choice or STAR) in your state for state elections and we can likely make it popular enough to get it to the national stage

[–] smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Speaking as an Australian:

I also feel like you need mandatory voting (with enforcement), like what we have. That reframes elections from "riling up your power base so they go out and vote" to "hey average voter, here's why you should vote for me and how things will improve if you do so".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Vote for the most useful option, then go make a difference in local politics or wherever you can actually influence anything. Limiting your interactions with politics to whining isn't going to change anything for the better and is definitely not going to get rid of Republicans nor Democrats.

[–] UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is the way. Even if you think voting for the "lesser" option is demeaning, it does no harm if you continue to use direct action as well

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mydude@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (7 children)

My father beat me when I was a kid, he ran for child services president and I voted for him. I heard that the other guy beat his kids more, so I really had a moral duty to vote for my dad. You guys, it's really important to vote for the guy who beats his kids less.

[–] spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My local mayor wants to increase funding for the public transit, but he didn't say ACAB, so I'm not gonna vote for him even if the other other guy is gonna slash the public transit funding by half 😤😤

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You make a good point.

The person you responded to also makes a good point.

There's no one-size-fits-all (all voters or all elections) solution on this one.

All we can ultimately do is encourage our fellow voters to open their minds, learn all they can about the issues and candidates, and make the best use they feel they can with their right to vote.

Shaming someone for not voting for your candidate is a great way to repel them from your camp long term. Respecting their decision, even if you disagree with it, sets a much better example of the sort of level-headedness you'd likely want people to associate with your causes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soulg@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

How? It is exactly what it sounds like when people say to vote for the "lesser evil", especially in this post.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Complain today about fewer options.

Complain tomorrow about Führer options.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's ok to complain. The complaints are valid. Still vote and encourage others to vote.

If your two choices are between a 99% fascist and a 98% fascist. Vote for the 98% fascist.

[–] spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Problem is that people actually think that it's 99% vs 98% (not saying you think that) when that's not the case. You have a guy that incited a riot against our democratic process and a guy that kept encouraging unity and actually helped fund infrastructure, local chip manufacturing, renewable funding, etc.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] monkE@feddit.ch 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In a democracy, if there is no alternative we have to vote for the lesser of the evil. It's better to keep things worse, than to make it more worse, if there is no alternative. If an alternative is there, then absolutely. We should all be encouraging an alternative system in a democracy. But if nothing's is available, then this.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's the logical answer in the short term, but it also makes you a "safe" voter that the Democrats don't have to care about in the long term.

Don't promise them your support in advance. Be a "swing" voter and make it clear to the party that if they want your vote they'll have to earn it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Saying democrats or voting got black people rights is a slap in the face of those who literally fought for them.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 year ago

I'm sure black people would have gotten better rights if no one voted for the lesser of 2 evils.

People fought for the rights, and politicians who supported those rights won elections because people voted for them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›