this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
769 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24561 readers
2949 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 241 points 7 months ago (4 children)

It's reasonably possible that trump likes him specifically because of these accusations.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 45 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What the hell are you talking about?

The president-elect has no idea what Gaetz looks like. The president-elect doesn’t even know Gaetz. The president-elect has never considered Gaetz for AG. The president-elect and Gaetz have never met.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (5 children)

For the uninformed, this is funny (and sarcasm) because there's mountains of evidence of them together. Besides, you know, picking him for AG. But he tries this defense all the time anyway, and people actually believe it.

Just like explicitly Trump calling up members of Congress to kill the bipartisan border bill, and then blaming the Democrats for not passing a border bill. They sold that one on the campaign trail too, and it worked.

Sources

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 19 points 7 months ago

To be fair Tim Walz tried to point out that Trump voted down the Border Bill.... and everyone just laughed at him and called him Tampon Tim because America is currently in its "Too Dumb To Live" phase

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 months ago

People don't actually believe it, they're just looking for an opportunity to give themselves plausible deniability. To let themselves off the hook for being complete pieces of shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

Every pick has been specifically chosen to be bad for their role.

Gaetz was 100% chosen for ATTORNEY GENERAL because of the accusations.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Kinda feels like it. I wonder if the idea is to lower the bar for the next pick -- someone who sucks 75% as badly?

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I think he's testing loyalty in the party. I think he wants exactly who he has chosen.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

It's like one massive trolling so they can say "see how bad it could have been? Now take this close to but not quite as bad choice and like it."

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 133 points 7 months ago (5 children)

The article mentions that he paid her to have sex with him at a party. That also makes it a sex trafficking crime. Also, IANAL but if the jurisdiction had an age of consent lower than 18, the sex trafficking part might negate that.

Also, Gaetz, who was born in 1982, was 35 at the time -- double her age and well outside the limits of any potential Romeo & Juliet laws.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 23 points 7 months ago

These parties were also said to be full of drugs (in addition to alcohol), which one could argue blurs any consent, especially when your looking at a 35/yr old man wanting to pay a 17/yr girl for sex. He was also a congressman by then, which also makes this a very lopsided power dynamic when arguing consent with a possibly intoxicated underage girl.

The woman's allegation regarding Gaetz became part of the investigation following claims by Greenberg, a former friend of Gaetz who is currently serving an 11-year prison sentence after reaching a deal with investigators in May 2021 in which he pleaded guilty to multiple federal crimes, including sex trafficking of the woman when she was a minor and introducing her to other "adult men" who also had sex with her when she was underage.

This part also make one more inclined to believe this has something to it, and probably more women that aren't coming forward because of all the death threats and toxicity projected at victims.

AND HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE OUR NEW AG!!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 63 points 7 months ago (40 children)

Ups his cred with Republicans. They love pedophiles.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That should probably give him a huge assist within trump’s regime. They seem to love that type of thing.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think he was selected for AG?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

Partly, to make the House drop their investigation because he's no longer a member...

I knew it was going to be bad, but holy shit...

I've also noticed nobody has even mentioned EPA. My guess is that he will just do away with it altogether.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

"These allegations are invented and would constitute false testimony to Congress," Gaetz said in response to ABC News' reporting.

AG Gaetz has his first case all lined up doesn't he?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago (8 children)

So, we are going to have an actual child-fucker as AG.

Republicans, "the party of law and order".

🤣

Btw, if there is anyone that I would believe would feed on adrenochrome....just look at Gaetz. Sure, the adrenochrome thing is just rehashed antisemitic blood libel bullshit, but I could see Gaetz maybe trying it out to see....

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Hey, the President is an adjuducated rapist with 34 felony convictions, why should the AG be clean?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The pizza basements will become mandatory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

There are many credible accusations against Trump being a pedophile. So why would his AG be any different?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Rapists are paying close attention.....a phrase that is now a normal thing one would expect to be said on radio and TV news.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 7 months ago

Gold star Attorney General qualities. Trump does surround himself with the best.

[–] ageek@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if Trump comes out and says that you have to be good at breaking the law before you can apply it

[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This AG appointment is the biggest troll but the dude stayed loyal to Trump.

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Trolling is baiting people to argue with you. This is destroying our nations integrity, one pedophile appointment at a time.

load more comments
view more: next ›