Orygin

I mean for privacy things it makes sense to avoid leaking anything. But I fail to understand where the danger is to have anonymous data that says a user installed "Ubuntu-24.04-wappity-whatever.iso" to "KINGSTON DATA TRAVELER 32GB" at some point.

Thanks for taking the time to explain it. Indeed the new runtime method does not guarantee when the resource will be cleaned, so something like that Drop trait would be quite useful

Not sure if that's what you are referring to as destructors, but they added a new way to have code run at resource collection in go 1.24

Not necessarily broken, just not updated recently. Some games might be fine as is

True, and more generally I would not recommend drinking out of plastic containers anyway

They don't even really look that good. A 3d printer could probably have similar output in an afternoon for less than 10 bucks of filament

Yeah, and they still charge a professional fee to the last tenant even though they did it horribly for half the cost

Heavy in taste or heavy in abv? We have both light in taste and light in alcohol beers, sometimes even both at the same time :)

The source engine does not handle case sensitivity when loading assets from disk. On windows it's not an issue but on Linux it will silently fail to load assets if the case doesn't match. I lost so many hours trying to fix some weapon animation that had 0 seconds run time when porting a mod dedicated server to Linux.

Personally, I don't give Microsoft the benefit of doubt. But technically I'm guessing they are not sending the audio data to their backend so no snooping there.
The rest of the meeting is free game however I'm pretty sure.

Except the entire use case for teams in our organization (and I'm sure many others) is basically just to chat and make calls. None of the extra stuff is useful to us.
Also you can look at slack which would also be a communications/collaboration platform, and weirdly enough the UX is fine and usable without training. Just admit MS shat the bed and made some Frankenstein abomination that no one knows how to use correctly. It's pretty typical of Microsoft (and apple too) to just deflect that the user is doing it wrong instead of admitting they could improve the experience.
To add to your RV analogy, Microsoft is selling an RV to moms and dads that just want to drop their kids to school. Sure sometimes they go on vacation and the RV is nice, but it's not what the user needs. It's also exactly why users hate it, they are given a monster truck just to go to the shop. (Plus in the case of software, they could have it transform as needed. The communication part could look like a regular sedan, but instead you are forced into the RV format at all times)

Is it really open source or just open weights ? Big difference