andyortlieb

joined 2 years ago
[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 days ago

Very very interesting, and stupid

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

If this gets any worse we're going to have to learn that space aliens are UHC customers.

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

How many years?

The amount of utility I accidentally extract from my phone over the course of a day on one charge is pretty incredible.

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 59 points 1 month ago

The weirdest thing about a cybertruck bomb is that the world has become so shit that it's not even interesting. Like, I just cannot care because every day something insane happens.

That's the real fucking signal IMO.

 

I'm trying to to find the balance between having an anti-clutter space for a clearer head versus not being wasteful about over washing things like button shirts or jeans which don't get used for a large portion of my day.

I used to throw them over my computer chair but I recently moved my computer out of my bedroom.

I think the best option is to hang them up in the closet so they can air out a little more than back in a drawer.

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 months ago

Interrupt your habits.

  • Uninstall the app, if you use that.
  • Log out in your browser.
  • If you use ublockorigin, add reddit.com to the custom block list
  • Use a password manager, change your password to something you can't remember. Then in your password manager, put a prefix on it like (take-a-break), so you have to go through the hassle of editing it to log in.

You don't need to be up to the minute or even the day for most of your interests, you can catch up when you have time to do so intentionally.

Interruptions cause you to slow down and give your will power a moment to catch up and intervene.

 

I don't have a background in science, I learned of the 2021 study as a footnote in a book I'm reading.

I'm curious to see what more attention this will get over the coming years.

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago

That is my take.

The delusion of grandeur I might suffer would be something like people foster such a strong culture of cooperation and mutual aid that state government operations and programs become obsolete.

That's a north star. Something to aim for as a concept. But of course we won't ever land a rocket ship on the actual North Star.

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think like any other political or philosophical view, this is one of those things where you will get one unique answer per each anarchist you ask.

Speaking personally, I think philosophies should be used as tools, and as the best tool for a job.

To me, anarchism means disregarding established authority and working together to achieve whatever a goal is. Ideally cooperatively. Some groups will perform well at this and some will not. Some will perform better under a more traditional organized structure.

I don't want to subjugate people with anarchist dogma. I want to help people learn to trust themselves and to cooperate. And I want to get better at it myself.

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Same as anarchism.

Lots of people valuing self reliance and care for others without regard for our existing leaders and systems. There just happens to also be systems of governments around.

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can put a date in your calendar to remember

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago

You still have brackets, but they're at every $0.01

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

Hey thanks for the deep context & lore, that was refreshingly orienting!

[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago

I'm ok with continuing to talk to people who aren't ready or willing to understand that.

 
 

Background:

I'm in my 40s and I've always sort of beaten myself up over not being an avid reader. I go through phases where I read a bunch, sometimes I'll finish a book in a months time, sometimes start a book and forget it, sometimes it seems like I go literally years without really getting into any book at all. But I still accumulate them.

Because of how important reading is and now I "fail" to prioritize it, I've always found myself in a poor relationship with reading. I feel this artificial pressure to read things that are only important and will somehow make me more useful. I feel this artificial pressure to start one book and read it to the end. I feel this artificial pressure to become a changed person by fully investing every bit of info from every book.

I've been learning that these pressures are untenable.

I've also noticed that I partake in all kinds of things without the same expectations: tv shows, games, podcasts, media and news outlets, social media, etc.

Right now I have 6 books that I am actively reading, and I am trying to remember that it's for enjoyment and not some high level goal. Someone told me if I read 10 pages a day I would finish about 10 books a year. I found this so encouraging.

Taking the pressure off of reading has really helped me get more productive at reading, and I think it will help me convert my habit into a truly fruitful one.

So now I ask you:

  • What are your reading habits like?
  • What do you like to read?
  • What kind of stage of life are you in, and how does that affect it?
  • Have you made any changes, positive or negative, to your reading habits?
  • What else?
 

Article III Section 1 of the Wisconsin Constitution currently reads, "Every United States citizen age 18 or older who is a resident of an election district in this state is a qualified elector of that district."

After Tuesday's vote, the article will now read, "Only a United States citizen age 18 or older who is a resident of an election district in this state is a qualified elector of that district."

Doesn't this change the meaning of the statement so much that it's no longer true that every citizen of age who is a resident is eligible to vote? Can this new language be interpreted by courts and lawmakers such that anyone can be disenfranchised if such malicious laws can be passed in the state?

 

My follow up curiosity: how can we find success & sustainability in meeting our basic needs and security by turning our backs right back on global industry (and government) by working inward within our local communities?

view more: next ›