They never had a "biblical right" because there is no such thing.
dandi8
joined 8 months ago
Out of curiosity, do you consider the sentence below to be a direct incitement to actionable violence?
"It would be patriotic if someone were to stop Person X from enacting their agenda, even if they used force."
If yes, what exactly qualifies it as a "direct incitement"?
Additionally, would you say it makes a difference whether the sentence above is said by Joe Shmoe vs televised and said by a powerful person with many followers hanging at their every word?
... Until your doctor starts pushing it because he saw it on Joe Rogan.
Kinda disappointing. I was hoping for a single-player-focused title.
The most shameful part is that the union unequivocally supports RTO, they just want it to be done a bit more slowly.
Fuck neurodivergent people, and people who took the job from another city, like those in rhe article who need to commute 6 hours a day, right?
That's not creepy or weird, that's horrifying.
Except "mass" is not useful by itself. It's not a chair factory where more people equals faster delivery, just like 9 women won't deliver a baby in a month. I wish companies understood this.
I think the answer to this is lack of adoption.
Ok, but the comment thread is about people preferring Bluesky to Mastodon, hence my confusion.
Isn't the format literally just Twitter?
Then I'd have to assume your religion is also not-believing-in-unicorns and round-earthism, as well as humans-need-oxygenism.
Agnosticism is not a lack of belief, it is a stance that one doesn't know whether a god exists or not. Frequently, the "belief" would be that it's impossible to know, which, by your definition, would also make it a religion.
The argument does not hold up.
view more: next ›
This is the dumbest take.