haloduder

joined 1 week ago
[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

Rich people love raping children.

It's an industry and part of their culture.

If you support rich people, you support child rapists and child rape.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

It's always the ones you most expect.

I'd love to see this guy's head on a pike.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 15 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

I personally think we should've have been reclaiming the wealth stolen from the working class by force.

It's not surprising that people like you have been duped into thinking 'now' is the time when it's been time for awhile. It just shows me how disconnected you are from reality and the actual problems we face.

None of you want to take the fight to the rich people because you all want to be the rich people or have been suckered into believing that we should be grateful for them.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 4 points 17 minutes ago

The older I get, the more I realize the slippery slope fallacy isn't a fallacy at all.

You shouldn't be so confident in your 'wisdom' if you're older than most of us and you haven't reached that conclusion yet.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 0 points 19 minutes ago

Would you be saying this if orange man wasn't in office?

If not, then you're part of the problem.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 20 minutes ago

Yeah, the answer is to just not play those games or give them your money in the first place.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I disagree, and the first time we used nukes on each other was completely justified.

Do some research into WWII-era Japan. They were horrific, just as bad as the Nazis and worse in many cases. They weren't going to surrender without being nuked. Military leaders even plotted overthrowing the prime minister after they were nuked so they could keep fighting and keep killing.

If the Allies had gone through with their invasion, it would have been a bloodbath with several times more deaths, both civilian and military, than what we got with Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

Right now it's 'cool' to revise history and say things like "Japan shouldn't have been nuked" or "the US civil war wasn't about slavery."

Open your eyes. Don't let the sensationalized crowds lead you astray; they don't know any better.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 hours ago

Do you find it strange how with all that considered, Intel is still competitive with AMD?

It's almost like Intel knows it can leapfrog AMD, but it chooses not to because then they would have to compete with their own innovations.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 hours ago

Fighting back against the people that made the world shit.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 hours ago

Excommunicating is the best example

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 hours ago

Richard Stallman being cancelled for defending a dead colleague against Epstein accusations.

It was clear people already had an axe to grind him, and they just used that as an excuse.

It was another reason for me not to take the average idiot seriously.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 hours ago

Virtual mission?

120
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by haloduder@thelemmy.club to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

It looks like the last verified contact with them has been in 2018. Recently a youtuber went there and tried to get their attention, but couldn't find them.

Is it possible they're not even still around? Maybe a disease found its way onto their island and took them out. It could have even been from the last visitor in 2018.

 

Since anyone can put anything they want on their servers, it seems like a lot of evidence could be thrown out in court cases if access to that information is not strictly monitored and audited to make sure the owners aren't removing or adding data.

Does anyone know of industry-standard practices to ensure that data on servers is not being manipulated in a way to protect or harm users?

view more: next ›