Yes, OpenAI wishes everyone else has to have authorization to do model training...
Fortunately, their ToS don't matter all that much, it's easy to use their model through a third party without ever touching them.
lily33
joined 2 years ago
The point of it being open is that people can remove any censorship built into it.
The particular AI model this article is talking about is actually openly published for anyone to freely use or modify (fine-tune). There is a barrier in that it requires several hundred gigs of RAM to run, but it is public.
It's almost sure to be the case, but nobody has managed to prove it yet.
Simply being infinite and non-repeating doesn't guarantee that all finite sequences will appear. For example, you could have an infinite non-repeating number that doesn't have any 9s in it. But, as far as numbers go, exceptions like that are very rare, and in almost all (infinite, non-repeating) numbers you'll have all finite sequences appearing.
Now, if only the article explained how that killing was related to TikTok. The only relevant thing I saw was,
had its roots in a confrontation on social media.
It's says "social media", not "TokTok" though.
I'm confused, isn't Fedora atomic immutable? Shouldn't that make it stateless automatically?
Why are you surprised? They are called cock-roaches, after all...
Why is this downvoted? If it's true it's a valid criticism, and if it's false, I couldn't find a mention of anonymity either.
Well, he didn't even buy the original (I guess it has spoiled by then), but a DIY replica and a certificate.
Wary reader, learn from my cautionary tale
I'm not sure what to learn exactly. I don't get what went wrong or why, just that the files hit deleted somehow...
To be fair, most people can't actually self-host Deepseek, but there already are other providers offering API access to it.