n1ck_n4m3

joined 10 months ago
[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 28 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Every single member of the military I've talked to, somehow, for some reason seems to support Trump. I'm fucking stunned by it, but it seems he has their support.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They don't need to cancel the mid-terms, they already fired everyone at CISA who is responsible for securing state elections. The elections will absolutely happen and miraculously the republicans will win across the board with a higher vote percentage than they've ever won by before, and they'll claim that this means the US population is 100% in support of the fascist policies of the GOP and accelerate the descent.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Considering that everyone at CISA responsible for securing state elections has been put on leave, I'm pretty sure there will never be another fair election in any shape in the USA.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There's a subset of the Democratic party with balls? I've been voting for them for over 20 years and I haven't seen it yet :(

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Deleted by author

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The problem is that the DMCA is a flawed piece of legislature that hamstrings fair use in a couple of really key ways.

Obligatory IANAL, but my read on the (admittedly very legalese) section 1201 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201) is that it lists a very few exemptions for what is allowable under the DMCA with regard to bypassing copyright protection mechanisms, and archival copies of personal media are not in that list of exemptions. Archival use of computer programs is covered under section 117 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/117) and it allows you to make a bit-by-bit copy of your media for archiving it. It doesn't allow you to bypass copyright protection mechanisms that exist on that content.

So, you'd be protected if you were making a 1:1 exact cloned (and therefore, encrypted) copy of your switch game. Any action to decrypt that switch game (because the encryption is explicitly a copyright protection mechanism) would be a violation, whether it be you doing it manually with a tool, or an emulator doing it on your behalf. If you move that violation outside of the emulator, I would think that based on how the law is written they'd have to find some other way you were violating the DMCA with the emulator specifically in order to target it.

Ultimately, I think the reason it's illegal is because the DMCA is corpo crap that has been bastardized several times over to reduce consumer rights, but the lawyers seem to wield section 1201 as the silver bullet.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Emulation is legal but emulators that circumvent the DMCA in order to function are not. Yuzu and Ryujinx both decrypt encrypted Switch content using prod keys and title keys in order to execute it. The act of decrypting switch games in real-time using those keys is a violation of DMCA and is illegal (in countries that care about the DMCA anyhow). Having code in your emulator that CAN decrypt the Switch content can be viewed as a DMCA violation as well, even if it also supports unencrypted content.

Based on that, it seems like all we need is for Ryujinx/Yuzu/some other switch emulator that hasn't yet been sued by Nintendo to be built in a way that it requires decrypted copies of the software and they could then argue that the person who violated the DMCA was the person who released the decryption tool or the teams that release decrypted versions of switch software.

Seems like if the developers remove the need for the emulator to use prod keys or title keys and they can remove the primary DMCA violation that is being weaponized against these emulators.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their name is Free_Opinions, we definitely got what we paid for.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Bringus needs more love around these parts

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yeah, Linus didn’t actually bother clicking the links.

Ya know, somehow I'm not surprised to hear LTT didn't do their research

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

~~Note that the SteamOS download on that page is NOT the current version of SteamOS used on the Steam Deck, it's the 2-3 year old version that Valve released a while back and doesn't have most any of the actual improvements to SteamOS that make it worthwhile. The only way to get the current SteamOS is to download the recovery image for the Steam Deck at https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/1B71-EDF2-EB6D-2BB3 and install from there.~~

Linus from LTT did a video about getting it up and running here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdR-bxvQKN8

EDIT: As per usual, Linus didn't do good research and was incorrect about the SteamOS version available at that link, updated to strike the incorrect info.

view more: next ›