this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
721 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23371 readers
3372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

JD Vance attempted a charm offensive on Tuesday, and failed with the charm while succeeding in being offensive.

It happened during an announcement that former Donald Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s son, Andrew Giuliani, would be leading a task force for the 2026 World Cup, which will take place in the United States, Canada and Mexico next year.

Rather than stoke excitement for a global event that could be a tourism cash cow for North America, Vance decided to take a different approach — and joked about deporting the potential thousands of tourists visiting the U.S. for the occasion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 136 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Oh hahahaha, now watch as you have the lowest WC attendance in history and be the first modern WC to lose money.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 102 points 1 day ago (1 children)

losing money on a sure thing would be totally on brand for donvict & co.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America will simply be the largest casino he's bankrupted so far

[–] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why people Talk about Casinos... He bankrupted Casinos but this destroyed the whole fucking City (anyway get my upvote)

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] IceFoxX@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago

I'm happy when my cell phone already writes the words I write and that's already a frustrating act, if punctuation marks are added, the cell phone is in 1000 pieces on the wall.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ticket sales are already going so badly that they're CHEAPER on the secondhand market! Scalpers are taking a loss to get rid of them, which is pretty much unheard of for an event like a world cup.

People are even more wary of traveling to Trump's US than to the Emir's Qatar or Putin's Russia.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Wait, are tickets for the 2026 World Cup already on sale?

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cities hosting the WC almost never recoup their investments. Sure, it's a windfall for a select few, but it is a bad investment for everyone else.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't know why ~~you're~~ you were being downvoted, you're absolutely right.

As documented by an excellent Last Week Tonight segment and also another, FIFA and a select few rich people and corporations profiting off of lucrative contracts snatch up all the income and leave everyone else with all the expenses.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

I don't know why ~~you're~~ you were being downvoted, you're absolutely right.

I think you just answered your own question. :)

[–] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

They hope for tourist. So do the math. Carefully... you must using MAGA math xD

[–] Geekboydave@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Genuine question, don't almost all countries lose money when they host the World Cup?

FIFA literally keeps all ticket sales and broadcasting money. Your only hope is to entice more visitors in the future or be an European country that already has stadiums literally everywhere.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Genuine question, don't almost all countries lose money when they host the World Cup?

No, they don't. A lot of money is generated from the attendance via hotel bookings, restaurant meals, alcohol sales, day excursions, VAT taxes, etc. For the tourism industry it's like shooting fish in a barrel.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I doubt FIFA is on the Republican take, and the event brings a bunch of brown people and Euros to town. Why would they care if it succeeds? If anything making it fail is part of their deliberate campaign of chaos.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I doubt FIFA is on the Republican take

Well that would be the first corrupt administration they didn't jump in bed with at the first opportunity then.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, holding the world cup in dictatorships is kind of their thing.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At what point is it a fetish for them?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago

It's just plain corruption, but I guess they get off on having lots of money?

[–] ours@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

As long as the cheque clears, they don't care.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Countries like Qatar, Brazil want to host the games for the prestige and the affinity for the sport.

US Republicans don't give a shit about "soccer." Being the brilliant dealmakers they are, they probably want FIFA to pay them.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I doubt FIFA is on the Republican take

Clearly you know very little about FIFA in general and Trump's buddy Infantino in particular..

Neither have ever seen a despotic government they didn't want bribes from.